YDHLGE Logo
YDHLGEYou Don't Hate Local Government Enough
Back to Docket Search
f. • Regular AgendaCity of Seguin (Guadalupe County)

Discussion and possible direction to staff on downtown economic development incentive policies regarding two specific Chapter 380 proposals: The 1908 at 100 East Court ($35,000 incentive) and the proposed The Canopy at 113 South Camp($50,000 incentiv

Presented in: City Council - March 04, 2025 on 2025-03-04
Meeting Agenda PDFOfficial Minutes PDF

Official Roll-Call Vote

Expands Gov't • 7.5/10 Impact Weight
PASSED (9 - 0)
“Moved by Monica Napier. approved: Discussion and possible direction to staff on downtown economic development incentive policies regarding two specific Chapter 380 proposals: The 1908 at 100 East Court ($35,000 inc”
DD
Donna Dodgen
Mayor (At-Large)
YES
JR
Joe Rea
Councilmember, District 1 (District 1)
YES
DE
David Eveld
Councilmember, District 2 (District 2)
YES
JL
Jim Lievens
Councilmember, District 3 (District 3)
YES
JC
John Carlsson
Councilmember, District 4 (District 4)
YES
PG
Paul Gaytan
Councilmember, District 5 (District 5)
YES
MN
Monica Napier
Councilmember, District 6 (District 6)
YES
JB
Jason Biesenbach
Councilmember, District 7 (District 7)
YES
BK
Bill Keller
Councilmember, District 8 (District 8)
YES

Staff Report & Agenda Item Details

Discussion and possible direction to staff on downtown economic development incentive policies regarding two specific Chapter 380 proposals: The 1908 at 100 East Court ($35,000 incentive) and the proposed The Canopy at 113 South Camp($50,000 incentive). For portions of this item, Council may choose to enter into Closed Session pursuant to Sections 551.071 and 551.087 of the Texas Government Code. - Kyle Kramm, Main Street & CVB Director/HPO

Bastiat Liberty & Property Rights Analysis

This motion is scored as EXPANDS_GOVERNMENT (Impact Weight: 7.5/10). Under the Bastiat Liberty Watchdog Index, measures that increase tax rates or fee schedules, issue new debt or Certificates of Obligation, expand regulatory/zoning restrictions on private land use, or authorize unbudgeted spending expansions reduce an official's Freedom Score when voted YES (and reward dissenting NO votes).