Back to Public Records SearchCow Creek Groundwater Conservation District Full Budget Trend →ELECTED / WONELECTED / WONELECTED / WONELECTED / WONELECTED / WONELECTED / WONELECTED / WONELECTED / WONELECTED / WONELECTED / WONELECTED / WONELECTED / WONELECTED / WONELECTED / WONELECTED / WONELECTED / WONELECTED / WONELECTED / WONELECTED / WONELECTED / WONELECTED / WONELECTED / WONELECTED / WONELECTED / WONELECTED / WONResolution Adopting Zero-Based Departmental Budget Caps & Freezing Administrative OverheadResolution Enforcing Competitive Sealed Bidding Caps & Rejecting Over-Budget Vendor Change Ordersfor each aquifer within the district, the annual volume of water that discharges fromPlease confirm that the GMA accepts the following assumptions for calculating modeledthe Upper Trinity Aquifer,Projected Surface Water Supplies (checklist item 6)Surface-water outflow-the total water discharging from the aquifer [outflow)the Upper Trinity Aquifer,Resolution Expanding Homestead & Over-65 / Disabled Taxpayer Ad Valorem ExemptionResolution Expanding Homestead & Over-65 / Disabled Taxpayer Ad Valorem ExemptionResolution Expanding Homestead & Over-65 / Disabled Taxpayer Ad Valorem ExemptionResolution Expanding Homestead & Over-65 / Disabled Taxpayer Ad Valorem ExemptionResolution Expanding Homestead & Over-65 / Disabled Taxpayer Ad Valorem ExemptionResolution Expanding Homestead & Over-65 / Disabled Taxpayer Ad Valorem ExemptionResolution Expanding Homestead & Over-65 / Disabled Taxpayer Ad Valorem ExemptionResolution Expanding Homestead & Over-65 / Disabled Taxpayer Ad Valorem ExemptionResolution Expanding Homestead & Over-65 / Disabled Taxpayer Ad Valorem ExemptionResolution Expanding Homestead & Over-65 / Disabled Taxpayer Ad Valorem ExemptionProjected Water Demands (checklist item 7)Projected Water Demands (checklist item 7)As in the previous planning cycle. we will only provide MAG values calEulated within the extent ofthe Middle Trinity Aquifer, andOrdinance Repealing Restrictive Minimum Lot-Size & By-Right Residential Building MandatesOrder Approving Private Property Land-Use Variance & Waiving Permitting FeesOrder Approving Private Property Land-Use Variance & Waiving Permitting FeesOrdinance Repealing Restrictive Minimum Lot-Size & By-Right Residential Building MandatesOrder Approving Private Property Land-Use Variance & Waiving Permitting FeesOrder Approving Private Property Land-Use Variance & Waiving Permitting FeesOrder Approving Private Property Land-Use Variance & Waiving Permitting FeesOrdinance Repealing Restrictive Minimum Lot-Size & By-Right Residential Building Mandatesthe Upper Trinity Aquifer,Projected Surface Water Supplies (checklist item 6)Please confirm that the GMA accepts the following assumptions for calculating modeledThe Cow Creek Groundwater Conservation District is committed to compliance vith the American Disabilities ActSurface-water outflow-the total water discharging from the aquifer [outflow)for each aquifer within the district, the annual volume of water that discharges fromThe Cow Creek Groundwater Conservation District is committed to compliance vith the American Disabilities ActProjected Surface Water Supplies (checklist item 6)Surface-water outflow-the total water discharging from the aquifer [outflow)for each aquifer within the district, the annual volume of water that discharges fromThe Cow Creek Groundwater Conservation District is committed to compliance vith the American Disabilities ActPlease confirm that the GMA accepts the following assumptions for calculating modeledResolution Expanding Homestead & Over-65 / Disabled Taxpayer Ad Valorem ExemptionResolution Expanding Homestead & Over-65 / Disabled Taxpayer Ad Valorem ExemptionResolution Expanding Homestead & Over-65 / Disabled Taxpayer Ad Valorem ExemptionResolution Expanding Homestead & Over-65 / Disabled Taxpayer Ad Valorem ExemptionResolution Expanding Homestead & Over-65 / Disabled Taxpayer Ad Valorem ExemptionResolution Expanding Homestead & Over-65 / Disabled Taxpayer Ad Valorem ExemptionResolution Expanding Homestead & Over-65 / Disabled Taxpayer Ad Valorem ExemptionResolution Expanding Homestead & Over-65 / Disabled Taxpayer Ad Valorem ExemptionResolution Expanding Homestead & Over-65 / Disabled Taxpayer Ad Valorem ExemptionResolution Expanding Homestead & Over-65 / Disabled Taxpayer Ad Valorem ExemptionResolution Expanding Homestead & Over-65 / Disabled Taxpayer Ad Valorem ExemptionResolution Expanding Homestead & Over-65 / Disabled Taxpayer Ad Valorem ExemptionResolution Expanding Homestead & Over-65 / Disabled Taxpayer Ad Valorem ExemptionResolution Expanding Homestead & Over-65 / Disabled Taxpayer Ad Valorem ExemptionResolution Expanding Homestead & Over-65 / Disabled Taxpayer Ad Valorem ExemptionResolution Expanding Homestead & Over-65 / Disabled Taxpayer Ad Valorem ExemptionResolution Expanding Homestead & Over-65 / Disabled Taxpayer Ad Valorem ExemptionResolution Expanding Homestead & Over-65 / Disabled Taxpayer Ad Valorem ExemptionResolution Expanding Homestead & Over-65 / Disabled Taxpayer Ad Valorem ExemptionResolution Expanding Homestead & Over-65 / Disabled Taxpayer Ad Valorem ExemptionResolution Expanding Homestead & Over-65 / Disabled Taxpayer Ad Valorem Exemptionthe annual volume of flow into and out of the district within each aquifer andAs in the previous planning cycle. we will only provide MAG values calEulated within the extent ofFlow into and out of district-the lateral flow within the aquifer between theCitizens vho desire to address the Board on any matter may sign up to do so prior to the meeting. Public comments willthe Middle Trinity Aquifer, andthe Middle Trinity Aquifer, andCitizens vho desire to address the Board on any matter may sign up to do so prior to the meeting. Public comments willFlow into and out of district-the lateral flow within the aquifer between thethe annual volume of flow into and out of the district within each aquifer andthe annual volume of flow into and out of the district within each aquifer andFlow into and out of district-the lateral flow within the aquifer between theAs in the previous planning cycle. we will only provide MAG values calEulated within the extent ofProjected Water Demands (checklist item 7)Citizens vho desire to address the Board on any matter may sign up to do so prior to the meeting. Public comments willOrder Approving Private Property Land-Use Variance & Waiving Permitting FeesOrdinance Repealing Restrictive Minimum Lot-Size & By-Right Residential Building MandatesOrdinance Repealing Restrictive Minimum Lot-Size & By-Right Residential Building MandatesOrder Approving Private Property Land-Use Variance & Waiving Permitting FeesOrder Approving Private Property Land-Use Variance & Waiving Permitting FeesOrdinance Repealing Restrictive Minimum Lot-Size & By-Right Residential Building MandatesOrder Approving Private Property Land-Use Variance & Waiving Permitting FeesOrdinance Repealing Restrictive Minimum Lot-Size & By-Right Residential Building MandatesOrder Approving Private Property Land-Use Variance & Waiving Permitting FeesOrdinance Repealing Restrictive Minimum Lot-Size & By-Right Residential Building MandatesOrder Approving Private Property Land-Use Variance & Waiving Permitting FeesOrdinance Repealing Restrictive Minimum Lot-Size & By-Right Residential Building MandatesOrdinance Repealing Restrictive Minimum Lot-Size & By-Right Residential Building MandatesOrdinance Repealing Restrictive Minimum Lot-Size & By-Right Residential Building MandatesOrder Approving Private Property Land-Use Variance & Waiving Permitting FeesOrdinance Repealing Restrictive Minimum Lot-Size & By-Right Residential Building MandatesOrder Approving Private Property Land-Use Variance & Waiving Permitting FeesOrdinance Repealing Restrictive Minimum Lot-Size & By-Right Residential Building MandatesOrder Approving Private Property Land-Use Variance & Waiving Permitting FeesOrdinance Repealing Restrictive Minimum Lot-Size & By-Right Residential Building MandatesOrder Approving Private Property Land-Use Variance & Waiving Permitting FeesOrdinance Repealing Restrictive Minimum Lot-Size & By-Right Residential Building MandatesOrder Approving Private Property Land-Use Variance & Waiving Permitting FeesBoard of Directors Regular BusinessOperator's Report: Utility Operations, Water/Sewer Infrastructure Maintenance, and Customer ServiceBookkeeper's Report: Review and approve payment of bills, disbursements, and investment activityApprove Minutes of Prior Board of Directors Regular MeetingConvene Meeting and Determination of QuorumBoard of Directors Regular BusinessBoard of Directors Regular Business0 0 5.pdfFlow between aquifers-the net vertical flow between the aquifer and adjacentProjected Water Supply Needs (checklist item 8)the annual volume of flow into and out of the district within each aquifer andAt any time during the meeting and in compliance vith the Texas Open Meetings Act, Chapter 5 5 I , Government Code,Please confirm that the phrase "overoge drawdown of no more than 7 feet in Kendall CountyCitizens vho desire to address the Board on any matter may sign up to do so prior to the meeting. Public comments willFlow into and out of district-the lateral flow within the aquifer between thethe Upper Trinity Aquifer,Surface-water outflow-the total water discharging from the aquifer [outflow)Since the GMA did not provide predictive model files. TWDB used the predictive model filesthe Lower Trinity AquiferEstimated Historical Groundwater Use (checklist item 2)Please confirm that the phrase "no net increase in average drawdown through 2080" ia the DFCSin.e the GMA did not provide predictive model files, TWDB used the predictive model filesProjected Water Demands (checklist item 7)Projected Surface Water Supplies (checklist item 6)Please confirm that the GMA accepts the following assumptions for calculating modeledPlease confirm that the phrase *average drawdown of approximately 3O feet thraugh 2O6OAs in the previous planning cycle, we will only provide MAG values calculated within the extent ofProjected Water Management Strategies (checklist item9)the Middle Trinity Aquifer, andfor each aquifer within the district, the annual volume of water that discharges fromAs in the previous planning cycle. we will only provide MAG values calEulated within the extent ofPlease confirm that the GMA accepts the following assumptions for calculating modeledPlease confirm that the GMA accepts the following assumptions for calculating modeledThe Cow Creek Groundwater Conservation District is committed to compliance vith the American Disabilities Actconsistent with "Scenario 6" in TWDB GAM Task 10-Flow into and out of district-the lateral flow within the aquifer between theFlow between aquifers-the net vertical flow between the aquifer and adjacentconsistent with "Scenario 6" in TWDB GAM Task 10-At any time during the meeting and in compliance vith the Texas Open Meetings Act, Chapter 5 5 I , Government Code,0 0 5.pdfCitizens vho desire to address the Board on any matter may sign up to do so prior to the meeting. Public comments willfor each aquifer within the district, the annual volume of water that discharges fromProjected Surface Water Supplies (checklist item 6)Projected Water Demands (checklist item 7)Projected Water Supply Needs (checklist item 8)Estimated Historical Groundwater Use (checklist item 2)Please confirm that the phrase "overoge drawdown of no more than 7 feet in Kendall CountySin.e the GMA did not provide predictive model files, TWDB used the predictive model filesProjected Water Management Strategies (checklist item9)Please confirm that the GMA accepts the following assumptions for calculating modeledPlease confirm that the phrase "no net increase in average drawdown through 2080" ia the DFCthe Upper Trinity Aquifer,Since the GMA did not provide predictive model files. TWDB used the predictive model filesPlease confirm that the GMA accepts the following assumptions for calculating modeledthe annual volume of flow into and out of the district within each aquifer andthe Middle Trinity Aquifer, andAs in the previous planning cycle. we will only provide MAG values calEulated within the extent ofThe Cow Creek Groundwater Conservation District is committed to compliance vith the American Disabilities ActPlease confirm that the phrase *average drawdown of approximately 3O feet thraugh 2O6Othe Lower Trinity AquiferPlease confirm that the GMA accepts the following assumptions for calculating modeledSurface-water outflow-the total water discharging from the aquifer [outflow)As in the previous planning cycle, we will only provide MAG values calculated within the extent ofPlease confirm that the GMA accepts the following assumptions for calculating modeledSince the GMA did not provide predictive model files. TWDB used the predictive model filesAs in the previous planning cycle, we will only provide MAG values calculated within the extent ofthe Lower Trinity AquiferAs in the previous planning cycle. we will only provide MAG values calEulated within the extent ofPlease confirm that the phrase "no net increase in average drawdown through 2080" ia the DFCPlease confirm that the GMA accepts the following assumptions for calculating modeledPlease confirm that the phrase "overoge drawdown of no more than 7 feet in Kendall Countyfor each aquifer within the district, the annual volume of water that discharges fromthe annual volume of flow into and out of the district within each aquifer andconsistent with "Scenario 6" in TWDB GAM Task 10-the Upper Trinity Aquifer,Flow between aquifers-the net vertical flow between the aquifer and adjacent0 0 5.pdfPlease confirm that the phrase *average drawdown of approximately 3O feet thraugh 2O6Othe Middle Trinity Aquifer, andFlow into and out of district-the lateral flow within the aquifer between theSin.e the GMA did not provide predictive model files, TWDB used the predictive model filesSurface-water outflow-the total water discharging from the aquifer [outflow)At any time during the meeting and in compliance vith the Texas Open Meetings Act, Chapter 5 5 I , Government Code,The Cow Creek Groundwater Conservation District is committed to compliance vith the American Disabilities ActCitizens vho desire to address the Board on any matter may sign up to do so prior to the meeting. Public comments willProjected Water Demands (checklist item 7)Projected Surface Water Supplies (checklist item 6)Projected Water Supply Needs (checklist item 8)Please confirm that the GMA accepts the following assumptions for calculating modeledEstimated Historical Groundwater Use (checklist item 2)Projected Water Management Strategies (checklist item9)At any time during the meeting and in compliance vith the Texas Open Meetings Act, Chapter 5 5 I , Government Code,Please confirm that the phrase "no net increase in average drawdown through 2080" ia the DFCSince the GMA did not provide predictive model files. TWDB used the predictive model filesCitizens vho desire to address the Board on any matter may sign up to do so prior to the meeting. Public comments willPlease confirm that the GMA accepts the following assumptions for calculating modeledAs in the previous planning cycle. we will only provide MAG values calEulated within the extent ofThe Cow Creek Groundwater Conservation District is committed to compliance vith the American Disabilities ActProjected Water Supply Needs (checklist item 8)Projected Water Demands (checklist item 7)
BW
SPECIAL_DISTRICT • Kendall COUNTY
Bob Webster
Director, Place 3
Elected Director, Place 3 for Cow Creek Groundwater Conservation District.
manager@ccgcd.org830-816-2504
Multi-Year Roll-Call & Fiscal Trajectory (2000–2026)
Voting Liberty Trend & Jurisdiction Budget Growth
5-Yr Roll-Call Trend
▲ +10.3 pts
Career Shift: +7.7 pts
Pro-Liberty Roll-Calls
56 Votes
vs. 44 Expansion Votes
Jurisdiction Budget (YoY)
+1.8% YoY
27-Yr CAGR: +2.5%/yr
5-Yr Jurisdiction Budget
+13.3% (5Y)
10Y: +28.9% • Since '00: +95.0%
Annual Roll-Call Liberty Trajectory (2000–2026)20 Recorded Legislative Sessions
2000: 91.7 (A+)2010: 96.8 (A+)2021: 89.1 (A)2026: 99.4 (A+)
Electoral History & Canvass Margins
May 2000 Cow Creek Groundwater Conservation District Uniform General & Special Election (2000-05-06)
Director, Place 3 (At-Large)
Bob Webster (Current Profile)72.0% (355 votes)
Rebecca A. Thornton 28.0% (138 votes)
Early Voting: 213Election Day: 124Mail Ballots: 18
May 2001 Cow Creek Groundwater Conservation District Uniform General & Special Election (2001-05-05)
Director, Place 3 (At-Large)
Bob Webster (Current Profile)71.0% (181 votes)
Sarah L. Henderson 29.0% (74 votes)
Early Voting: 109Election Day: 63Mail Ballots: 9
May 2002 Cow Creek Groundwater Conservation District Uniform General & Special Election (2002-05-04)
Director, Place 3 (At-Large)
Bob Webster (Current Profile)66.0% (213 votes)
Jennifer M. Garza 34.0% (110 votes)
Early Voting: 128Election Day: 75Mail Ballots: 10
May 2003 Cow Creek Groundwater Conservation District Uniform General & Special Election (2003-05-03)
Director, Place 3 (At-Large)
Bob Webster (Current Profile)60.0% (224 votes)
Rebecca A. Thornton 40.0% (150 votes)
Early Voting: 134Election Day: 78Mail Ballots: 12
May 2004 Cow Creek Groundwater Conservation District Uniform General & Special Election (2004-05-01)
Director, Place 3 (At-Large)
Bob Webster (Current Profile)61.0% (239 votes)
Thomas W. Callahan 39.0% (152 votes)
Early Voting: 143Election Day: 84Mail Ballots: 12
May 2005 Cow Creek Groundwater Conservation District Uniform General & Special Election (2005-05-07)
Director, Place 3 (At-Large)
Bob Webster (Current Profile)69.0% (328 votes)
Rebecca A. Thornton 31.0% (148 votes)
Early Voting: 197Election Day: 115Mail Ballots: 16
May 2006 Cow Creek Groundwater Conservation District Uniform General & Special Election (2006-05-06)
Director, Place 3 (At-Large)
Bob Webster (Current Profile)69.0% (270 votes)
Thomas W. Callahan 31.0% (121 votes)
Early Voting: 162Election Day: 95Mail Ballots: 13
May 2007 Cow Creek Groundwater Conservation District Uniform General & Special Election (2007-05-05)
Director, Place 3 (At-Large)
Bob Webster (Current Profile)70.0% (167 votes)
David C. Morales 30.0% (71 votes)
Early Voting: 100Election Day: 58Mail Ballots: 9
May 2008 Cow Creek Groundwater Conservation District Uniform General & Special Election (2008-05-03)
Director, Place 3 (At-Large)
Bob Webster (Current Profile)58.0% (138 votes)
Rebecca A. Thornton 42.0% (100 votes)
Early Voting: 83Election Day: 48Mail Ballots: 7
May 2009 Cow Creek Groundwater Conservation District Uniform General & Special Election (2009-05-02)
Director, Place 3 (At-Large)
Bob Webster (Current Profile)65.0% (210 votes)
Rebecca A. Thornton 35.0% (113 votes)
Early Voting: 126Election Day: 74Mail Ballots: 10
May 2010 Cow Creek Groundwater Conservation District Uniform General & Special Election (2010-05-01)
Director, Place 3 (At-Large)
Bob Webster (Current Profile)61.0% (145 votes)
David C. Morales 39.0% (93 votes)
Early Voting: 87Election Day: 51Mail Ballots: 7
May 2011 Cow Creek Groundwater Conservation District Uniform General & Special Election (2011-05-07)
Director, Place 3 (At-Large)
Bob Webster (Current Profile)72.0% (233 votes)
David C. Morales 28.0% (90 votes)
Early Voting: 140Election Day: 82Mail Ballots: 11
May 2012 Cow Creek Groundwater Conservation District Uniform General & Special Election (2012-05-05)
Director, Place 3 (At-Large)
Bob Webster (Current Profile)70.0% (333 votes)
Sarah L. Henderson 30.0% (143 votes)
Early Voting: 200Election Day: 117Mail Ballots: 16
May 2013 Cow Creek Groundwater Conservation District Uniform General & Special Election (2013-05-04)
Director, Place 3 (At-Large)
Bob Webster (Current Profile)56.0% (143 votes)
Jennifer M. Garza 44.0% (112 votes)
Early Voting: 86Election Day: 50Mail Ballots: 7
May 2014 Cow Creek Groundwater Conservation District Uniform General & Special Election (2014-05-03)
Director, Place 3 (At-Large)
Bob Webster (Current Profile)64.0% (283 votes)
Thomas W. Callahan 36.0% (159 votes)
Early Voting: 170Election Day: 99Mail Ballots: 14
May 2015 Cow Creek Groundwater Conservation District Uniform General & Special Election (2015-05-02)
Director, Place 3 (At-Large)
Bob Webster (Current Profile)66.0% (325 votes)
Thomas W. Callahan 34.0% (168 votes)
Early Voting: 195Election Day: 114Mail Ballots: 16
May 2016 Cow Creek Groundwater Conservation District Uniform General & Special Election (2016-05-07)
Director, Place 3 (At-Large)
Bob Webster (Current Profile)56.0% (295 votes)
Sarah L. Henderson 44.0% (232 votes)
Early Voting: 177Election Day: 103Mail Ballots: 15
May 2017 Cow Creek Groundwater Conservation District Uniform General & Special Election (2017-05-06)
Director, Place 3 (At-Large)
Bob Webster (Current Profile)69.0% (270 votes)
Rebecca A. Thornton 31.0% (121 votes)
Early Voting: 162Election Day: 95Mail Ballots: 13
May 2018 Cow Creek Groundwater Conservation District Uniform General & Special Election (2018-05-05)
Director, Place 3 (At-Large)
Bob Webster (Current Profile)65.0% (309 votes)
Sarah L. Henderson 35.0% (167 votes)
Early Voting: 185Election Day: 108Mail Ballots: 16
May 2019 Cow Creek Groundwater Conservation District Uniform General & Special Election (2019-05-04)
Director, Place 3 (At-Large)
Bob Webster (Current Profile)61.0% (249 votes)
Thomas W. Callahan 39.0% (159 votes)
Early Voting: 149Election Day: 87Mail Ballots: 13
May 2020 Cow Creek Groundwater Conservation District Uniform General & Special Election (2020-05-02)
Director, Place 3 (At-Large)
Bob Webster (Current Profile)70.0% (238 votes)
David C. Morales 30.0% (102 votes)
Early Voting: 143Election Day: 83Mail Ballots: 12
May 2021 Cow Creek Groundwater Conservation District Uniform General & Special Election (2021-05-01)
Director, Place 3 (At-Large)
Bob Webster (Current Profile)71.0% (302 votes)
Michael R. Vance 29.0% (123 votes)
Early Voting: 181Election Day: 106Mail Ballots: 15
May 2022 Cow Creek Groundwater Conservation District Uniform General & Special Election (2022-05-07)
Director, Place 3 (At-Large)
Bob Webster (Current Profile)71.0% (374 votes)
Michael R. Vance 29.0% (153 votes)
Early Voting: 224Election Day: 131Mail Ballots: 19
May 2023 Cow Creek Groundwater Conservation District Uniform General & Special Election (2023-05-06)
Director, Place 3 (At-Large)
Bob Webster (Current Profile)65.0% (320 votes)
Thomas W. Callahan 35.0% (173 votes)
Early Voting: 192Election Day: 112Mail Ballots: 16
May 2025 Cow Creek Groundwater Conservation District Official General Election Canvass (2025-05-03)
Director, Place 3
Bob Webster (Current Profile)100.0% (141 votes)
Early Voting: 86Election Day: 48Mail Ballots: 7
Roll-Call Voting Record & Scorecard
Total Recorded Votes
4393
Yes Votes
4365 (99%)
No / Dissenting Votes
28 (1%)
Abstentions
0
Recorded Public Votes Log
Ordered from most impactful to Freedom Score to least impactful#1VOTED: YES+8.4 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2026-10-14#2VOTED: YES+4.5 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2026-10-14#3VOTED: NO+2.8 Score Impact • Pro-Liberty Dissent (Opposed Overreach)Outcome: PASSED (4-1)
2023-09-26#4VOTED: NO+2.8 Score Impact • Pro-Liberty Dissent (Opposed Overreach)Outcome: PASSED (3-2)
2022-05-06#5VOTED: NO+2.8 Score Impact • Pro-Liberty Dissent (Opposed Overreach)Outcome: PASSED (4-1)
2022-05-06#6VOTED: NO+2.8 Score Impact • Pro-Liberty Dissent (Opposed Overreach)Outcome: PASSED (4-1)
2021-09-27#7VOTED: NO+2.8 Score Impact • Pro-Liberty Dissent (Opposed Overreach)Outcome: PASSED (4-1)
2021-09-27#8VOTED: NO+2.8 Score Impact • Pro-Liberty Dissent (Opposed Overreach)Outcome: PASSED (3-2)
2021-09-27#9VOTED: NO-2.8 Score Impact • Opposed ReformOutcome: PASSED (4-1)
2014-09-10#10VOTED: NO-2.8 Score Impact • Opposed ReformOutcome: PASSED (3-2)
2013-09-11#11VOTED: NO-2.8 Score Impact • Opposed ReformOutcome: PASSED (4-1)
2013-05-08#12VOTED: NO-2.8 Score Impact • Opposed ReformOutcome: PASSED (4-1)
2008-09-10#13VOTED: NO-2.8 Score Impact • Opposed ReformOutcome: PASSED (4-1)
2007-09-12#14VOTED: NO-2.8 Score Impact • Opposed ReformOutcome: PASSED (4-1)
2005-09-14#15VOTED: NO-2.8 Score Impact • Opposed ReformOutcome: PASSED (4-1)
2003-09-10#16VOTED: NO-2.8 Score Impact • Opposed ReformOutcome: PASSED (4-1)
2002-09-11#17VOTED: NO-2.8 Score Impact • Opposed ReformOutcome: PASSED (3-2)
2001-05-09#18VOTED: NO-2.8 Score Impact • Opposed ReformOutcome: PASSED (4-1)
2000-09-13#19VOTED: NO+2.3 Score Impact • Pro-Liberty Dissent (Opposed Overreach)Outcome: PASSED (3-2)
2023-09-26#20VOTED: NO+2.3 Score Impact • Pro-Liberty Dissent (Opposed Overreach)Outcome: PASSED (4-1)
2022-05-06#21VOTED: NO+2.3 Score Impact • Pro-Liberty Dissent (Opposed Overreach)Outcome: PASSED (3-2)
2022-05-06#22VOTED: NO+2.3 Score Impact • Pro-Liberty Dissent (Opposed Overreach)Outcome: PASSED (4-1)
2021-09-27#23VOTED: NO-2.3 Score Impact • Opposed ReformOutcome: PASSED (3-2)
2014-09-10#24VOTED: NO-2.3 Score Impact • Opposed ReformOutcome: PASSED (4-1)
2014-05-14#25VOTED: NO-2.3 Score Impact • Opposed ReformOutcome: PASSED (3-2)
2013-05-08#26VOTED: NO-2.3 Score Impact • Opposed ReformOutcome: PASSED (4-1)
2011-09-14#27VOTED: NO-2.3 Score Impact • Opposed ReformOutcome: PASSED (3-2)
2007-05-09#28VOTED: NO-2.3 Score Impact • Opposed ReformOutcome: PASSED (4-1)
2006-05-10#29VOTED: NO-2.3 Score Impact • Opposed ReformOutcome: PASSED (4-1)
2003-05-14#30VOTED: NO-2.3 Score Impact • Opposed ReformOutcome: PASSED (4-1)
2002-09-11#31VOTED: YES-2.0 Score Impact • Gov't ExpansionOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2023-09-26#32VOTED: YES-2.0 Score Impact • Gov't ExpansionOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2023-09-26#33VOTED: YES-2.0 Score Impact • Gov't ExpansionOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2023-09-26#34VOTED: YES-2.0 Score Impact • Gov't ExpansionOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2023-09-26#35VOTED: YES-2.0 Score Impact • Gov't ExpansionOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2023-09-26#36VOTED: YES-2.0 Score Impact • Gov't ExpansionOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2022-05-06#37VOTED: YES-2.0 Score Impact • Gov't ExpansionOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2022-05-06#38VOTED: YES-2.0 Score Impact • Gov't ExpansionOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2022-05-06#39VOTED: YES-2.0 Score Impact • Gov't ExpansionOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2022-05-06#40VOTED: YES-2.0 Score Impact • Gov't ExpansionOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2021-09-27#41VOTED: YES-2.0 Score Impact • Gov't ExpansionOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2021-09-27#42VOTED: YES-2.0 Score Impact • Gov't ExpansionOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2021-09-27#43VOTED: YES+2.0 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2020-05-13#44VOTED: YES+2.0 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2014-05-14#45VOTED: YES+2.0 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2012-09-12#46VOTED: YES+2.0 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2012-05-09#47VOTED: YES+2.0 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2011-09-14#48VOTED: YES+2.0 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2011-05-11#49VOTED: YES+2.0 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2010-09-08#50VOTED: YES+2.0 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2010-05-12#51VOTED: YES+2.0 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2009-09-09#52VOTED: YES+2.0 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2009-05-13#53VOTED: YES+2.0 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2008-05-14#54VOTED: YES+2.0 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2007-05-09#55VOTED: YES+2.0 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2006-09-13#56VOTED: YES+2.0 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2006-05-10#57VOTED: YES+2.0 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2005-05-11#58VOTED: YES+2.0 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2004-09-08#59VOTED: YES+2.0 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2004-05-12#60VOTED: YES+2.0 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2003-05-14#61VOTED: YES+2.0 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2002-05-08#62VOTED: YES+2.0 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2001-09-12#63VOTED: YES+2.0 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2000-05-10#64VOTED: YES-1.5 Score Impact • Gov't ExpansionOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2023-09-26#65VOTED: YES-1.5 Score Impact • Gov't ExpansionOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2023-09-26#66VOTED: YES-1.5 Score Impact • Gov't ExpansionOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2023-09-26#67VOTED: YES-1.5 Score Impact • Gov't ExpansionOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2023-09-26#68VOTED: YES-1.5 Score Impact • Gov't ExpansionOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2023-09-26#69VOTED: YES-1.5 Score Impact • Gov't ExpansionOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2022-05-06#70VOTED: YES-1.5 Score Impact • Gov't ExpansionOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2022-05-06#71VOTED: YES-1.5 Score Impact • Gov't ExpansionOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2022-05-06#72VOTED: YES-1.5 Score Impact • Gov't ExpansionOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2022-05-06#73VOTED: YES-1.5 Score Impact • Gov't ExpansionOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2021-09-27#74VOTED: YES-1.5 Score Impact • Gov't ExpansionOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2021-09-27#75VOTED: YES-1.5 Score Impact • Gov't ExpansionOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2021-09-27#76VOTED: YES-1.5 Score Impact • Gov't ExpansionOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2021-09-27#77VOTED: YES-1.5 Score Impact • Gov't ExpansionOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2021-09-27#78VOTED: YES+1.5 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2020-05-13#79VOTED: YES+1.5 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2013-09-11#80VOTED: YES+1.5 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2012-09-12#81VOTED: YES+1.5 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2012-05-09#82VOTED: YES+1.5 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2011-05-11#83VOTED: YES+1.5 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2010-09-08#84VOTED: YES+1.5 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2010-05-12#85VOTED: YES+1.5 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2009-09-09#86VOTED: YES+1.5 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2009-05-13#87VOTED: YES+1.5 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2008-09-10#88VOTED: YES+1.5 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2008-05-14#89VOTED: YES+1.5 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2007-09-12#90VOTED: YES+1.5 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2006-09-13#91VOTED: YES+1.5 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2005-09-14#92VOTED: YES+1.5 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2005-05-11#93VOTED: YES+1.5 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2004-09-08#94VOTED: YES+1.5 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2004-05-12#95VOTED: YES+1.5 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2003-09-10#96VOTED: YES+1.5 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2002-05-08#97VOTED: YES+1.5 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2001-09-12#98VOTED: YES+1.5 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2001-05-09#99VOTED: YES+1.5 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2000-09-13#100VOTED: YES+1.5 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2000-05-10#101VOTED: YES0.0 Score Impact • ProceduralOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2026-10-20#102VOTED: YES0.0 Score Impact • ProceduralOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2026-10-14#103VOTED: YES0.0 Score Impact • ProceduralOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2026-10-14#104VOTED: YES0.0 Score Impact • ProceduralOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2026-10-14#105VOTED: YES0.0 Score Impact • ProceduralOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2026-10-14#106VOTED: YES0.0 Score Impact • ProceduralOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2026-09-29#107VOTED: YES0.0 Score Impact • ProceduralOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2026-09-14#108VOTED: YES0.0 Score Impact • ProceduralOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2026-08-10#109VOTED: YES0.0 Score Impact • ProceduralOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2026-08-10#110VOTED: YES0.0 Score Impact • ProceduralOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2026-08-10#111VOTED: YES0.0 Score Impact • ProceduralOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2026-08-10#112VOTED: YES0.0 Score Impact • ProceduralOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2026-08-10#113VOTED: YES0.0 Score Impact • ProceduralOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2026-08-10#114VOTED: YES0.0 Score Impact • ProceduralOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2026-08-10#115VOTED: YES0.0 Score Impact • ProceduralOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2026-08-10#116VOTED: YES0.0 Score Impact • ProceduralOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2026-08-10#117VOTED: YES0.0 Score Impact • ProceduralOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2026-08-10#118VOTED: YES0.0 Score Impact • ProceduralOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2026-08-10#119VOTED: YES0.0 Score Impact • ProceduralOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2026-08-10#120VOTED: YES0.0 Score Impact • ProceduralOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2026-08-10#121VOTED: YES0.0 Score Impact • ProceduralOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2026-08-10#122VOTED: YES0.0 Score Impact • ProceduralOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2026-08-10#123VOTED: YES0.0 Score Impact • ProceduralOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2026-08-10#124VOTED: YES0.0 Score Impact • ProceduralOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2026-08-10#125VOTED: YES0.0 Score Impact • ProceduralOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2026-08-10#126VOTED: YES0.0 Score Impact • ProceduralOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2026-08-10#127VOTED: YES0.0 Score Impact • ProceduralOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2026-08-10#128VOTED: YES0.0 Score Impact • ProceduralOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2026-08-10#129VOTED: YES0.0 Score Impact • ProceduralOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2026-08-10#130VOTED: YES0.0 Score Impact • ProceduralOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2026-08-10#131VOTED: YES0.0 Score Impact • ProceduralOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2026-08-10#132VOTED: YES0.0 Score Impact • ProceduralOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2026-08-10#133VOTED: YES0.0 Score Impact • ProceduralOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2026-08-10#134VOTED: YES0.0 Score Impact • ProceduralOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2026-08-10#135VOTED: YES0.0 Score Impact • ProceduralOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2026-08-10#136VOTED: YES0.0 Score Impact • ProceduralOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2026-07-13#137VOTED: YES0.0 Score Impact • ProceduralOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2026-07-13#138VOTED: YES0.0 Score Impact • ProceduralOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2026-07-13#139VOTED: YES0.0 Score Impact • ProceduralOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2026-07-13#140VOTED: YES0.0 Score Impact • ProceduralOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2026-07-13#141VOTED: YES0.0 Score Impact • ProceduralOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2026-07-13#142VOTED: YES0.0 Score Impact • ProceduralOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2026-07-13#143VOTED: YES0.0 Score Impact • ProceduralOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2026-07-13#144VOTED: YES0.0 Score Impact • ProceduralOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2026-07-13#145VOTED: YES0.0 Score Impact • ProceduralOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2026-07-13#146VOTED: YES0.0 Score Impact • ProceduralOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2026-07-13#147VOTED: YES0.0 Score Impact • ProceduralOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2026-07-13#148VOTED: YES0.0 Score Impact • ProceduralOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2026-07-13#149VOTED: YES0.0 Score Impact • ProceduralOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2026-07-13#150VOTED: YES0.0 Score Impact • ProceduralOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2026-07-13#151VOTED: YES0.0 Score Impact • ProceduralOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2026-07-13#152VOTED: YES0.0 Score Impact • ProceduralOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2026-07-13#153VOTED: YES0.0 Score Impact • ProceduralOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2026-07-13#154VOTED: YES0.0 Score Impact • ProceduralOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2026-07-13#155VOTED: YES0.0 Score Impact • ProceduralOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2026-07-13#156VOTED: YES0.0 Score Impact • ProceduralOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2026-07-13#157VOTED: YES0.0 Score Impact • ProceduralOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2026-07-13#158VOTED: YES0.0 Score Impact • ProceduralOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2026-07-13#159VOTED: YES0.0 Score Impact • ProceduralOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2026-07-13#160VOTED: YES0.0 Score Impact • ProceduralOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2026-07-13#161VOTED: YES0.0 Score Impact • ProceduralOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2026-07-13#162VOTED: YES0.0 Score Impact • ProceduralOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2026-07-13#163VOTED: YES0.0 Score Impact • ProceduralOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2026-07-13#164VOTED: YES0.0 Score Impact • ProceduralOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2026-06-08#165VOTED: YES0.0 Score Impact • ProceduralOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2026-06-08#166VOTED: YES0.0 Score Impact • ProceduralOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2026-06-08#167VOTED: YES0.0 Score Impact • ProceduralOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2026-06-08#168VOTED: YES0.0 Score Impact • ProceduralOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2026-06-08#169VOTED: YES0.0 Score Impact • ProceduralOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2026-06-08#170VOTED: YES0.0 Score Impact • ProceduralOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2026-06-08#171VOTED: YES0.0 Score Impact • ProceduralOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2026-06-08#172VOTED: YES0.0 Score Impact • ProceduralOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2026-06-08#173VOTED: YES0.0 Score Impact • ProceduralOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2026-06-08#174VOTED: YES0.0 Score Impact • ProceduralOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2026-06-08#175VOTED: YES0.0 Score Impact • ProceduralOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2026-06-08#176VOTED: YES0.0 Score Impact • ProceduralOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2026-06-08#177VOTED: YES0.0 Score Impact • ProceduralOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2026-06-08#178VOTED: YES0.0 Score Impact • ProceduralOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2026-06-08#179VOTED: YES0.0 Score Impact • ProceduralOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2026-06-08#180VOTED: YES0.0 Score Impact • ProceduralOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2026-06-08#181VOTED: YES0.0 Score Impact • ProceduralOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2026-06-08#182VOTED: YES0.0 Score Impact • ProceduralOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2026-06-08#183VOTED: YES0.0 Score Impact • ProceduralOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2026-06-08#184VOTED: YES0.0 Score Impact • ProceduralOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2026-06-08#185VOTED: YES0.0 Score Impact • ProceduralOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2026-06-08#186VOTED: YES0.0 Score Impact • ProceduralOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2026-06-08#187VOTED: YES0.0 Score Impact • ProceduralOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2026-06-08#188VOTED: YES0.0 Score Impact • ProceduralOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2026-06-08#189VOTED: YES0.0 Score Impact • ProceduralOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2026-06-08#190VOTED: YES0.0 Score Impact • ProceduralOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2026-06-08#191VOTED: YES0.0 Score Impact • ProceduralOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2026-06-08#192VOTED: YES0.0 Score Impact • ProceduralOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2026-05-11#193VOTED: YES0.0 Score Impact • ProceduralOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2026-05-11#194VOTED: YES0.0 Score Impact • ProceduralOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2026-05-11#195VOTED: YES0.0 Score Impact • ProceduralOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2026-05-11#196VOTED: YES0.0 Score Impact • ProceduralOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2026-05-11#197VOTED: YES0.0 Score Impact • ProceduralOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2026-05-11#198VOTED: YES0.0 Score Impact • ProceduralOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2026-05-11#199VOTED: YES0.0 Score Impact • ProceduralOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2026-05-11#200VOTED: YES0.0 Score Impact • ProceduralOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2026-05-11