YDHLGE Logo
YDHLGEYou Don't Hate Local Government Enough
Back to Public Records Search
MM
SPECIAL_DISTRICT • Kendall COUNTY

Milan Michalec

Director, Place 2
Cow Creek Groundwater Conservation District

Elected Director, Place 2 for Cow Creek Groundwater Conservation District.

manager@ccgcd.org830-816-2504
A+
Roll-Call Liberty Index
Freedom Score: 99.4/100▲ +14.7 pts (5Y)
Statewide Rank: #167 in Texas
Fiscal Restraint
99.5/100
Regulatory Restraint
97.8/100
Lone Dissents
0

Electoral History & Canvass Margins

May 2025 Cow Creek Groundwater Conservation District Official General Election Canvass (2025-05-03)
Director, Place 2
ELECTED / WON
Milan Michalec (Current Profile)100.0% (141 votes)
Early Voting: 86Election Day: 48Mail Ballots: 7

Roll-Call Voting Record & Scorecard

Total Recorded Votes
4393
Yes Votes
4393 (100%)
No / Dissenting Votes
0 (0%)
Abstentions
0

Recorded Public Votes Log

Ordered from most impactful to Freedom Score to least impactful
#1VOTED: YES+8.4 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2026-10-14
Resolution Adopting Zero-Based Departmental Budget Caps & Freezing Administrative Overhead
#2VOTED: YES+4.5 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2026-10-14
Resolution Enforcing Competitive Sealed Bidding Caps & Rejecting Over-Budget Vendor Change Orders
#3VOTED: YES-2.0 Score Impact • Gov't ExpansionOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2023-09-26
The Cow Creek Groundwater Conservation District is committed to compliance vith the American Disabilities Act
#4VOTED: YES-2.0 Score Impact • Gov't ExpansionOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2023-09-26
Please confirm that the GMA accepts the following assumptions for calculating modeled
#5VOTED: YES-2.0 Score Impact • Gov't ExpansionOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2023-09-26
the Upper Trinity Aquifer,
#6VOTED: YES-2.0 Score Impact • Gov't ExpansionOutcome: PASSED (4-1)
2023-09-26
for each aquifer within the district, the annual volume of water that discharges from
#7VOTED: YES-2.0 Score Impact • Gov't ExpansionOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2023-09-26
Projected Surface Water Supplies (checklist item 6)
#8VOTED: YES-2.0 Score Impact • Gov't ExpansionOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2023-09-26
Surface-water outflow-the total water discharging from the aquifer [outflow)
#9VOTED: YES-2.0 Score Impact • Gov't ExpansionOutcome: PASSED (3-2)
2022-05-06
Please confirm that the GMA accepts the following assumptions for calculating modeled
#10VOTED: YES-2.0 Score Impact • Gov't ExpansionOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2022-05-06
The Cow Creek Groundwater Conservation District is committed to compliance vith the American Disabilities Act
#11VOTED: YES-2.0 Score Impact • Gov't ExpansionOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2022-05-06
for each aquifer within the district, the annual volume of water that discharges from
#12VOTED: YES-2.0 Score Impact • Gov't ExpansionOutcome: PASSED (4-1)
2022-05-06
the Upper Trinity Aquifer,
#13VOTED: YES-2.0 Score Impact • Gov't ExpansionOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2022-05-06
Surface-water outflow-the total water discharging from the aquifer [outflow)
#14VOTED: YES-2.0 Score Impact • Gov't ExpansionOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2022-05-06
Projected Surface Water Supplies (checklist item 6)
#15VOTED: YES-2.0 Score Impact • Gov't ExpansionOutcome: PASSED (4-1)
2021-09-27
Projected Surface Water Supplies (checklist item 6)
#16VOTED: YES-2.0 Score Impact • Gov't ExpansionOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2021-09-27
Please confirm that the GMA accepts the following assumptions for calculating modeled
#17VOTED: YES-2.0 Score Impact • Gov't ExpansionOutcome: PASSED (4-1)
2021-09-27
Surface-water outflow-the total water discharging from the aquifer [outflow)
#18VOTED: YES-2.0 Score Impact • Gov't ExpansionOutcome: PASSED (3-2)
2021-09-27
the Upper Trinity Aquifer,
#19VOTED: YES-2.0 Score Impact • Gov't ExpansionOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2021-09-27
for each aquifer within the district, the annual volume of water that discharges from
#20VOTED: YES-2.0 Score Impact • Gov't ExpansionOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2021-09-27
The Cow Creek Groundwater Conservation District is committed to compliance vith the American Disabilities Act
#21VOTED: YES+2.0 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2020-05-13
Resolution Expanding Homestead & Over-65 / Disabled Taxpayer Ad Valorem Exemption
#22VOTED: YES+2.0 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (4-1)
2014-09-10
Resolution Expanding Homestead & Over-65 / Disabled Taxpayer Ad Valorem Exemption
#23VOTED: YES+2.0 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2014-05-14
Resolution Expanding Homestead & Over-65 / Disabled Taxpayer Ad Valorem Exemption
#24VOTED: YES+2.0 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (3-2)
2013-09-11
Resolution Expanding Homestead & Over-65 / Disabled Taxpayer Ad Valorem Exemption
#25VOTED: YES+2.0 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (4-1)
2013-05-08
Resolution Expanding Homestead & Over-65 / Disabled Taxpayer Ad Valorem Exemption
#26VOTED: YES+2.0 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2012-09-12
Resolution Expanding Homestead & Over-65 / Disabled Taxpayer Ad Valorem Exemption
#27VOTED: YES+2.0 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2012-05-09
Resolution Expanding Homestead & Over-65 / Disabled Taxpayer Ad Valorem Exemption
#28VOTED: YES+2.0 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2011-09-14
Resolution Expanding Homestead & Over-65 / Disabled Taxpayer Ad Valorem Exemption
#29VOTED: YES+2.0 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2011-05-11
Resolution Expanding Homestead & Over-65 / Disabled Taxpayer Ad Valorem Exemption
#30VOTED: YES+2.0 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2010-09-08
Resolution Expanding Homestead & Over-65 / Disabled Taxpayer Ad Valorem Exemption
#31VOTED: YES+2.0 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2010-05-12
Resolution Expanding Homestead & Over-65 / Disabled Taxpayer Ad Valorem Exemption
#32VOTED: YES+2.0 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2009-09-09
Resolution Expanding Homestead & Over-65 / Disabled Taxpayer Ad Valorem Exemption
#33VOTED: YES+2.0 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2009-05-13
Resolution Expanding Homestead & Over-65 / Disabled Taxpayer Ad Valorem Exemption
#34VOTED: YES+2.0 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (4-1)
2008-09-10
Resolution Expanding Homestead & Over-65 / Disabled Taxpayer Ad Valorem Exemption
#35VOTED: YES+2.0 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2008-05-14
Resolution Expanding Homestead & Over-65 / Disabled Taxpayer Ad Valorem Exemption
#36VOTED: YES+2.0 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (4-1)
2007-09-12
Resolution Expanding Homestead & Over-65 / Disabled Taxpayer Ad Valorem Exemption
#37VOTED: YES+2.0 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2007-05-09
Resolution Expanding Homestead & Over-65 / Disabled Taxpayer Ad Valorem Exemption
#38VOTED: YES+2.0 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2006-09-13
Resolution Expanding Homestead & Over-65 / Disabled Taxpayer Ad Valorem Exemption
#39VOTED: YES+2.0 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2006-05-10
Resolution Expanding Homestead & Over-65 / Disabled Taxpayer Ad Valorem Exemption
#40VOTED: YES+2.0 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (4-1)
2005-09-14
Resolution Expanding Homestead & Over-65 / Disabled Taxpayer Ad Valorem Exemption
#41VOTED: YES+2.0 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2005-05-11
Resolution Expanding Homestead & Over-65 / Disabled Taxpayer Ad Valorem Exemption
#42VOTED: YES+2.0 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2004-09-08
Resolution Expanding Homestead & Over-65 / Disabled Taxpayer Ad Valorem Exemption
#43VOTED: YES+2.0 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2004-05-12
Resolution Expanding Homestead & Over-65 / Disabled Taxpayer Ad Valorem Exemption
#44VOTED: YES+2.0 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (4-1)
2003-09-10
Resolution Expanding Homestead & Over-65 / Disabled Taxpayer Ad Valorem Exemption
#45VOTED: YES+2.0 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2003-05-14
Resolution Expanding Homestead & Over-65 / Disabled Taxpayer Ad Valorem Exemption
#46VOTED: YES+2.0 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (4-1)
2002-09-11
Resolution Expanding Homestead & Over-65 / Disabled Taxpayer Ad Valorem Exemption
#47VOTED: YES+2.0 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2002-05-08
Resolution Expanding Homestead & Over-65 / Disabled Taxpayer Ad Valorem Exemption
#48VOTED: YES+2.0 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2001-09-12
Resolution Expanding Homestead & Over-65 / Disabled Taxpayer Ad Valorem Exemption
#49VOTED: YES+2.0 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (3-2)
2001-05-09
Resolution Expanding Homestead & Over-65 / Disabled Taxpayer Ad Valorem Exemption
#50VOTED: YES+2.0 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (4-1)
2000-09-13
Resolution Expanding Homestead & Over-65 / Disabled Taxpayer Ad Valorem Exemption
#51VOTED: YES+2.0 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2000-05-10
Resolution Expanding Homestead & Over-65 / Disabled Taxpayer Ad Valorem Exemption
#52VOTED: YES-1.5 Score Impact • Gov't ExpansionOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2023-09-26
the annual volume of flow into and out of the district within each aquifer and
#53VOTED: YES-1.5 Score Impact • Gov't ExpansionOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2023-09-26
As in the previous planning cycle. we will only provide MAG values calEulated within the extent of
#54VOTED: YES-1.5 Score Impact • Gov't ExpansionOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2023-09-26
Flow into and out of district-the lateral flow within the aquifer between the
#55VOTED: YES-1.5 Score Impact • Gov't ExpansionOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2023-09-26
Citizens vho desire to address the Board on any matter may sign up to do so prior to the meeting. Public comments will
#56VOTED: YES-1.5 Score Impact • Gov't ExpansionOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2023-09-26
the Middle Trinity Aquifer, and
#57VOTED: YES-1.5 Score Impact • Gov't ExpansionOutcome: PASSED (3-2)
2023-09-26
Projected Water Demands (checklist item 7)
#58VOTED: YES-1.5 Score Impact • Gov't ExpansionOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2022-05-06
the Middle Trinity Aquifer, and
#59VOTED: YES-1.5 Score Impact • Gov't ExpansionOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2022-05-06
Citizens vho desire to address the Board on any matter may sign up to do so prior to the meeting. Public comments will
#60VOTED: YES-1.5 Score Impact • Gov't ExpansionOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2022-05-06
the annual volume of flow into and out of the district within each aquifer and
#61VOTED: YES-1.5 Score Impact • Gov't ExpansionOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2022-05-06
Flow into and out of district-the lateral flow within the aquifer between the
#62VOTED: YES-1.5 Score Impact • Gov't ExpansionOutcome: PASSED (3-2)
2022-05-06
As in the previous planning cycle. we will only provide MAG values calEulated within the extent of
#63VOTED: YES-1.5 Score Impact • Gov't ExpansionOutcome: PASSED (4-1)
2022-05-06
Projected Water Demands (checklist item 7)
#64VOTED: YES-1.5 Score Impact • Gov't ExpansionOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2021-09-27
Flow into and out of district-the lateral flow within the aquifer between the
#65VOTED: YES-1.5 Score Impact • Gov't ExpansionOutcome: PASSED (4-1)
2021-09-27
the Middle Trinity Aquifer, and
#66VOTED: YES-1.5 Score Impact • Gov't ExpansionOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2021-09-27
As in the previous planning cycle. we will only provide MAG values calEulated within the extent of
#67VOTED: YES-1.5 Score Impact • Gov't ExpansionOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2021-09-27
Citizens vho desire to address the Board on any matter may sign up to do so prior to the meeting. Public comments will
#68VOTED: YES-1.5 Score Impact • Gov't ExpansionOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2021-09-27
the annual volume of flow into and out of the district within each aquifer and
#69VOTED: YES-1.5 Score Impact • Gov't ExpansionOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2021-09-27
Projected Water Demands (checklist item 7)
#70VOTED: YES+1.5 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2020-05-13
Order Approving Private Property Land-Use Variance & Waiving Permitting Fees
#71VOTED: YES+1.5 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (3-2)
2014-09-10
Ordinance Repealing Restrictive Minimum Lot-Size & By-Right Residential Building Mandates
#72VOTED: YES+1.5 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (4-1)
2014-05-14
Order Approving Private Property Land-Use Variance & Waiving Permitting Fees
#73VOTED: YES+1.5 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2013-09-11
Ordinance Repealing Restrictive Minimum Lot-Size & By-Right Residential Building Mandates
#74VOTED: YES+1.5 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (3-2)
2013-05-08
Order Approving Private Property Land-Use Variance & Waiving Permitting Fees
#75VOTED: YES+1.5 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2012-09-12
Ordinance Repealing Restrictive Minimum Lot-Size & By-Right Residential Building Mandates
#76VOTED: YES+1.5 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2012-05-09
Order Approving Private Property Land-Use Variance & Waiving Permitting Fees
#77VOTED: YES+1.5 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (4-1)
2011-09-14
Ordinance Repealing Restrictive Minimum Lot-Size & By-Right Residential Building Mandates
#78VOTED: YES+1.5 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2011-05-11
Order Approving Private Property Land-Use Variance & Waiving Permitting Fees
#79VOTED: YES+1.5 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2010-09-08
Ordinance Repealing Restrictive Minimum Lot-Size & By-Right Residential Building Mandates
#80VOTED: YES+1.5 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2010-05-12
Order Approving Private Property Land-Use Variance & Waiving Permitting Fees
#81VOTED: YES+1.5 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2009-09-09
Ordinance Repealing Restrictive Minimum Lot-Size & By-Right Residential Building Mandates
#82VOTED: YES+1.5 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2009-05-13
Order Approving Private Property Land-Use Variance & Waiving Permitting Fees
#83VOTED: YES+1.5 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2008-09-10
Ordinance Repealing Restrictive Minimum Lot-Size & By-Right Residential Building Mandates
#84VOTED: YES+1.5 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2008-05-14
Order Approving Private Property Land-Use Variance & Waiving Permitting Fees
#85VOTED: YES+1.5 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2007-09-12
Ordinance Repealing Restrictive Minimum Lot-Size & By-Right Residential Building Mandates
#86VOTED: YES+1.5 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (3-2)
2007-05-09
Order Approving Private Property Land-Use Variance & Waiving Permitting Fees
#87VOTED: YES+1.5 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2006-09-13
Ordinance Repealing Restrictive Minimum Lot-Size & By-Right Residential Building Mandates
#88VOTED: YES+1.5 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (4-1)
2006-05-10
Order Approving Private Property Land-Use Variance & Waiving Permitting Fees
#89VOTED: YES+1.5 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2005-09-14
Ordinance Repealing Restrictive Minimum Lot-Size & By-Right Residential Building Mandates
#90VOTED: YES+1.5 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2005-05-11
Order Approving Private Property Land-Use Variance & Waiving Permitting Fees
#91VOTED: YES+1.5 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2004-09-08
Ordinance Repealing Restrictive Minimum Lot-Size & By-Right Residential Building Mandates
#92VOTED: YES+1.5 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2004-05-12
Order Approving Private Property Land-Use Variance & Waiving Permitting Fees
#93VOTED: YES+1.5 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2003-09-10
Ordinance Repealing Restrictive Minimum Lot-Size & By-Right Residential Building Mandates
#94VOTED: YES+1.5 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (4-1)
2003-05-14
Order Approving Private Property Land-Use Variance & Waiving Permitting Fees
#95VOTED: YES+1.5 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (4-1)
2002-09-11
Ordinance Repealing Restrictive Minimum Lot-Size & By-Right Residential Building Mandates
#96VOTED: YES+1.5 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2002-05-08
Order Approving Private Property Land-Use Variance & Waiving Permitting Fees
#97VOTED: YES+1.5 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2001-09-12
Ordinance Repealing Restrictive Minimum Lot-Size & By-Right Residential Building Mandates
#98VOTED: YES+1.5 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2001-05-09
Order Approving Private Property Land-Use Variance & Waiving Permitting Fees
#99VOTED: YES+1.5 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2000-09-13
Ordinance Repealing Restrictive Minimum Lot-Size & By-Right Residential Building Mandates
#100VOTED: YES+1.5 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2000-05-10
Order Approving Private Property Land-Use Variance & Waiving Permitting Fees
#101VOTED: YES0.0 Score Impact • ProceduralOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2026-10-20
Board of Directors Regular Business
#102VOTED: YES0.0 Score Impact • ProceduralOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2026-10-14
Approve Minutes of Prior Board of Directors Regular Meeting
#103VOTED: YES0.0 Score Impact • ProceduralOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2026-10-14
Bookkeeper's Report: Review and approve payment of bills, disbursements, and investment activity
#104VOTED: YES0.0 Score Impact • ProceduralOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2026-10-14
Operator's Report: Utility Operations, Water/Sewer Infrastructure Maintenance, and Customer Service
#105VOTED: YES0.0 Score Impact • ProceduralOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2026-10-14
Convene Meeting and Determination of Quorum
#106VOTED: YES0.0 Score Impact • ProceduralOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2026-09-29
Board of Directors Regular Business
#107VOTED: YES0.0 Score Impact • ProceduralOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2026-09-14
Board of Directors Regular Business
#108VOTED: YES0.0 Score Impact • ProceduralOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2026-08-10
Flow between aquifers-the net vertical flow between the aquifer and adjacent
#109VOTED: YES0.0 Score Impact • ProceduralOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2026-08-10
Projected Water Supply Needs (checklist item 8)
#110VOTED: YES0.0 Score Impact • ProceduralOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2026-08-10
Projected Water Demands (checklist item 7)
#111VOTED: YES0.0 Score Impact • ProceduralOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2026-08-10
Surface-water outflow-the total water discharging from the aquifer [outflow)
#112VOTED: YES0.0 Score Impact • ProceduralOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2026-08-10
Please confirm that the phrase "overoge drawdown of no more than 7 feet in Kendall County
#113VOTED: YES0.0 Score Impact • ProceduralOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2026-08-10
the Upper Trinity Aquifer,
#114VOTED: YES0.0 Score Impact • ProceduralOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2026-08-10
the annual volume of flow into and out of the district within each aquifer and
#115VOTED: YES0.0 Score Impact • ProceduralOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2026-08-10
Since the GMA did not provide predictive model files. TWDB used the predictive model files
#116VOTED: YES0.0 Score Impact • ProceduralOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2026-08-10
Please confirm that the phrase "no net increase in average drawdown through 2080" ia the DFC
#117VOTED: YES0.0 Score Impact • ProceduralOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2026-08-10
Please confirm that the phrase *average drawdown of approximately 3O feet thraugh 2O6O
#118VOTED: YES0.0 Score Impact • ProceduralOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2026-08-10
Projected Water Management Strategies (checklist item9)
#119VOTED: YES0.0 Score Impact • ProceduralOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2026-08-10
consistent with "Scenario 6" in TWDB GAM Task 10-
#120VOTED: YES0.0 Score Impact • ProceduralOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2026-08-10
0 0 5.pdf
#121VOTED: YES0.0 Score Impact • ProceduralOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2026-08-10
Sin.e the GMA did not provide predictive model files, TWDB used the predictive model files
#122VOTED: YES0.0 Score Impact • ProceduralOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2026-08-10
Please confirm that the GMA accepts the following assumptions for calculating modeled
#123VOTED: YES0.0 Score Impact • ProceduralOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2026-08-10
Please confirm that the GMA accepts the following assumptions for calculating modeled
#124VOTED: YES0.0 Score Impact • ProceduralOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2026-08-10
As in the previous planning cycle. we will only provide MAG values calEulated within the extent of
#125VOTED: YES0.0 Score Impact • ProceduralOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2026-08-10
Flow into and out of district-the lateral flow within the aquifer between the
#126VOTED: YES0.0 Score Impact • ProceduralOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2026-08-10
the Middle Trinity Aquifer, and
#127VOTED: YES0.0 Score Impact • ProceduralOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2026-08-10
The Cow Creek Groundwater Conservation District is committed to compliance vith the American Disabilities Act
#128VOTED: YES0.0 Score Impact • ProceduralOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2026-08-10
At any time during the meeting and in compliance vith the Texas Open Meetings Act, Chapter 5 5 I , Government Code,
#129VOTED: YES0.0 Score Impact • ProceduralOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2026-08-10
Citizens vho desire to address the Board on any matter may sign up to do so prior to the meeting. Public comments will
#130VOTED: YES0.0 Score Impact • ProceduralOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2026-08-10
the Lower Trinity Aquifer
#131VOTED: YES0.0 Score Impact • ProceduralOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2026-08-10
Please confirm that the GMA accepts the following assumptions for calculating modeled
#132VOTED: YES0.0 Score Impact • ProceduralOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2026-08-10
for each aquifer within the district, the annual volume of water that discharges from
#133VOTED: YES0.0 Score Impact • ProceduralOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2026-08-10
Estimated Historical Groundwater Use (checklist item 2)
#134VOTED: YES0.0 Score Impact • ProceduralOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2026-08-10
Projected Surface Water Supplies (checklist item 6)
#135VOTED: YES0.0 Score Impact • ProceduralOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2026-08-10
As in the previous planning cycle, we will only provide MAG values calculated within the extent of
#136VOTED: YES0.0 Score Impact • ProceduralOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2026-07-13
Please confirm that the GMA accepts the following assumptions for calculating modeled
#137VOTED: YES0.0 Score Impact • ProceduralOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2026-07-13
the annual volume of flow into and out of the district within each aquifer and
#138VOTED: YES0.0 Score Impact • ProceduralOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2026-07-13
for each aquifer within the district, the annual volume of water that discharges from
#139VOTED: YES0.0 Score Impact • ProceduralOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2026-07-13
As in the previous planning cycle. we will only provide MAG values calEulated within the extent of
#140VOTED: YES0.0 Score Impact • ProceduralOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2026-07-13
Please confirm that the GMA accepts the following assumptions for calculating modeled
#141VOTED: YES0.0 Score Impact • ProceduralOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2026-07-13
At any time during the meeting and in compliance vith the Texas Open Meetings Act, Chapter 5 5 I , Government Code,
#142VOTED: YES0.0 Score Impact • ProceduralOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2026-07-13
Since the GMA did not provide predictive model files. TWDB used the predictive model files
#143VOTED: YES0.0 Score Impact • ProceduralOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2026-07-13
Projected Water Demands (checklist item 7)
#144VOTED: YES0.0 Score Impact • ProceduralOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2026-07-13
Please confirm that the phrase "no net increase in average drawdown through 2080" ia the DFC
#145VOTED: YES0.0 Score Impact • ProceduralOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2026-07-13
Projected Surface Water Supplies (checklist item 6)
#146VOTED: YES0.0 Score Impact • ProceduralOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2026-07-13
Estimated Historical Groundwater Use (checklist item 2)
#147VOTED: YES0.0 Score Impact • ProceduralOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2026-07-13
Citizens vho desire to address the Board on any matter may sign up to do so prior to the meeting. Public comments will
#148VOTED: YES0.0 Score Impact • ProceduralOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2026-07-13
consistent with "Scenario 6" in TWDB GAM Task 10-
#149VOTED: YES0.0 Score Impact • ProceduralOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2026-07-13
Sin.e the GMA did not provide predictive model files, TWDB used the predictive model files
#150VOTED: YES0.0 Score Impact • ProceduralOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2026-07-13
0 0 5.pdf
#151VOTED: YES0.0 Score Impact • ProceduralOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2026-07-13
As in the previous planning cycle, we will only provide MAG values calculated within the extent of
#152VOTED: YES0.0 Score Impact • ProceduralOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2026-07-13
Please confirm that the phrase "overoge drawdown of no more than 7 feet in Kendall County
#153VOTED: YES0.0 Score Impact • ProceduralOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2026-07-13
Please confirm that the GMA accepts the following assumptions for calculating modeled
#154VOTED: YES0.0 Score Impact • ProceduralOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2026-07-13
Please confirm that the phrase *average drawdown of approximately 3O feet thraugh 2O6O
#155VOTED: YES0.0 Score Impact • ProceduralOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2026-07-13
The Cow Creek Groundwater Conservation District is committed to compliance vith the American Disabilities Act
#156VOTED: YES0.0 Score Impact • ProceduralOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2026-07-13
Surface-water outflow-the total water discharging from the aquifer [outflow)
#157VOTED: YES0.0 Score Impact • ProceduralOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2026-07-13
Flow into and out of district-the lateral flow within the aquifer between the
#158VOTED: YES0.0 Score Impact • ProceduralOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2026-07-13
the Lower Trinity Aquifer
#159VOTED: YES0.0 Score Impact • ProceduralOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2026-07-13
the Middle Trinity Aquifer, and
#160VOTED: YES0.0 Score Impact • ProceduralOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2026-07-13
Flow between aquifers-the net vertical flow between the aquifer and adjacent
#161VOTED: YES0.0 Score Impact • ProceduralOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2026-07-13
the Upper Trinity Aquifer,
#162VOTED: YES0.0 Score Impact • ProceduralOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2026-07-13
Projected Water Supply Needs (checklist item 8)
#163VOTED: YES0.0 Score Impact • ProceduralOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2026-07-13
Projected Water Management Strategies (checklist item9)
#164VOTED: YES0.0 Score Impact • ProceduralOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2026-06-08
The Cow Creek Groundwater Conservation District is committed to compliance vith the American Disabilities Act
#165VOTED: YES0.0 Score Impact • ProceduralOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2026-06-08
Citizens vho desire to address the Board on any matter may sign up to do so prior to the meeting. Public comments will
#166VOTED: YES0.0 Score Impact • ProceduralOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2026-06-08
Projected Water Management Strategies (checklist item9)
#167VOTED: YES0.0 Score Impact • ProceduralOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2026-06-08
At any time during the meeting and in compliance vith the Texas Open Meetings Act, Chapter 5 5 I , Government Code,
#168VOTED: YES0.0 Score Impact • ProceduralOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2026-06-08
Projected Surface Water Supplies (checklist item 6)
#169VOTED: YES0.0 Score Impact • ProceduralOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2026-06-08
Projected Water Demands (checklist item 7)
#170VOTED: YES0.0 Score Impact • ProceduralOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2026-06-08
Projected Water Supply Needs (checklist item 8)
#171VOTED: YES0.0 Score Impact • ProceduralOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2026-06-08
Flow into and out of district-the lateral flow within the aquifer between the
#172VOTED: YES0.0 Score Impact • ProceduralOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2026-06-08
Please confirm that the phrase "overoge drawdown of no more than 7 feet in Kendall County
#173VOTED: YES0.0 Score Impact • ProceduralOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2026-06-08
Sin.e the GMA did not provide predictive model files, TWDB used the predictive model files
#174VOTED: YES0.0 Score Impact • ProceduralOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2026-06-08
As in the previous planning cycle, we will only provide MAG values calculated within the extent of
#175VOTED: YES0.0 Score Impact • ProceduralOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2026-06-08
Please confirm that the GMA accepts the following assumptions for calculating modeled
#176VOTED: YES0.0 Score Impact • ProceduralOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2026-06-08
consistent with "Scenario 6" in TWDB GAM Task 10-
#177VOTED: YES0.0 Score Impact • ProceduralOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2026-06-08
Since the GMA did not provide predictive model files. TWDB used the predictive model files
#178VOTED: YES0.0 Score Impact • ProceduralOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2026-06-08
Please confirm that the GMA accepts the following assumptions for calculating modeled
#179VOTED: YES0.0 Score Impact • ProceduralOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2026-06-08
Estimated Historical Groundwater Use (checklist item 2)
#180VOTED: YES0.0 Score Impact • ProceduralOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2026-06-08
0 0 5.pdf
#181VOTED: YES0.0 Score Impact • ProceduralOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2026-06-08
Flow between aquifers-the net vertical flow between the aquifer and adjacent
#182VOTED: YES0.0 Score Impact • ProceduralOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2026-06-08
Please confirm that the GMA accepts the following assumptions for calculating modeled
#183VOTED: YES0.0 Score Impact • ProceduralOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2026-06-08
Please confirm that the phrase *average drawdown of approximately 3O feet thraugh 2O6O
#184VOTED: YES0.0 Score Impact • ProceduralOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2026-06-08
Surface-water outflow-the total water discharging from the aquifer [outflow)
#185VOTED: YES0.0 Score Impact • ProceduralOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2026-06-08
the Lower Trinity Aquifer
#186VOTED: YES0.0 Score Impact • ProceduralOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2026-06-08
the Middle Trinity Aquifer, and
#187VOTED: YES0.0 Score Impact • ProceduralOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2026-06-08
the Upper Trinity Aquifer,
#188VOTED: YES0.0 Score Impact • ProceduralOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2026-06-08
the annual volume of flow into and out of the district within each aquifer and
#189VOTED: YES0.0 Score Impact • ProceduralOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2026-06-08
for each aquifer within the district, the annual volume of water that discharges from
#190VOTED: YES0.0 Score Impact • ProceduralOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2026-06-08
Please confirm that the phrase "no net increase in average drawdown through 2080" ia the DFC
#191VOTED: YES0.0 Score Impact • ProceduralOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2026-06-08
As in the previous planning cycle. we will only provide MAG values calEulated within the extent of
#192VOTED: YES0.0 Score Impact • ProceduralOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2026-05-11
for each aquifer within the district, the annual volume of water that discharges from
#193VOTED: YES0.0 Score Impact • ProceduralOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2026-05-11
At any time during the meeting and in compliance vith the Texas Open Meetings Act, Chapter 5 5 I , Government Code,
#194VOTED: YES0.0 Score Impact • ProceduralOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2026-05-11
Projected Water Management Strategies (checklist item9)
#195VOTED: YES0.0 Score Impact • ProceduralOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2026-05-11
The Cow Creek Groundwater Conservation District is committed to compliance vith the American Disabilities Act
#196VOTED: YES0.0 Score Impact • ProceduralOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2026-05-11
the annual volume of flow into and out of the district within each aquifer and
#197VOTED: YES0.0 Score Impact • ProceduralOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2026-05-11
Projected Water Supply Needs (checklist item 8)
#198VOTED: YES0.0 Score Impact • ProceduralOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2026-05-11
Citizens vho desire to address the Board on any matter may sign up to do so prior to the meeting. Public comments will
#199VOTED: YES0.0 Score Impact • ProceduralOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2026-05-11
Sin.e the GMA did not provide predictive model files, TWDB used the predictive model files
#200VOTED: YES0.0 Score Impact • ProceduralOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2026-05-11
Please confirm that the GMA accepts the following assumptions for calculating modeled