YDHLGE Logo
YDHLGEYou Don't Hate Local Government Enough
Back to Docket Search
I.4 • Action ItemsSMITHVILLE ISD (Bastrop County)

Consider Approval of Election Services Contract with Fayette County Description: Athough the Bastrop County Elections Administrator oversees all elections ordered by the school district, Smithville ISD also has less than 200 voters who reside in Fayette County.  Fayette County Elections have agreed to contract services for SISD constituents who reside in Fayette County and the proposed contract is

Presented in: SMITHVILLE ISD Board of Trustees Regular Meeting on 2026-01-20
Meeting Agenda PDF

Official Roll-Call Vote

Expands Gov't • 4.8/10 Impact Weight
PASSED (7 - 0)
“Action on Consider Approval of Election Services Contract with Fayette County Description: Athough the Bastrop County Elections Administrator oversees all elections ordered by the school district, Smithville IS”
BJ
Bryan Jones
Trustee, Place 5 (Place 5)
YES
CP
Candy Parsons
Trustee, Place 6 (Place 6)
YES
CV
Chelsa Vinklarek
Trustee, Place 7 (Place 7)
YES
CH
Chris Hinnant
Trustee, Place 1 (Place 1)
YES
GG
Grant Gutierrez
Trustee, Place 2 (Place 2)
YES
JM
Josh Magden
Trustee, Place 3 (Place 3)
YES
MH
Michael Hancock
Trustee, Place 4 (Place 4)
YES

Staff Report & Agenda Item Details

I.4. Consider Approval of Election Services Contract with Fayette County Description: Athough the Bastrop County Elections Administrator oversees all elections ordered by the school district, Smithville ISD also has less than 200 voters who reside in Fayette County.  Fayette County Elections have agreed to contract services for SISD constituents who reside in Fayette County and the proposed contract is included in the board packet for approval. Attachments: ( 1 ) Contract Election Services Fayette County 1/20/2026 at 1:20 PM

Bastiat Liberty & Property Rights Analysis

This motion is scored as EXPANDS_GOVERNMENT (Impact Weight: 4.8/10). Under the Bastiat Liberty Watchdog Index, measures that increase tax rates or fee schedules, issue new debt or Certificates of Obligation, expand regulatory/zoning restrictions on private land use, or authorize unbudgeted spending expansions reduce an official's Freedom Score when voted YES (and reward dissenting NO votes).