YDHLGE Logo
YDHLGEYou Don't Hate Local Government Enough
Back to Docket Search
37 • Action ItemsSMITHVILLE ISD (Bastrop County)

H.8. Consider Approval of an Interlocal Agreement with the City of Smithville Regarding Reciprocal Facility Usage Description: The Proposed Interlocal Agreement (ILA) would allow reciprocal use of facilities for non-profit or governmental purposes, subject to capacity, schedule, and available resources for use. These facilities include the SISD basketball gyms, Smithville Recreation Center and Cit

Presented in: SMITHVILLE ISD Board of Trustees Regular Meeting on 2026-04-20
Meeting Agenda PDF

Official Roll-Call Vote

Restrains Gov't • 4.4/10 Impact Weight
PASSED (7 - 0)
“Action on H.8. Consider Approval of an Interlocal Agreement with the City of Smithville Regarding Reciprocal Facility Usage Description: The Proposed Interlocal Agreement (ILA) would allow reciprocal use of fac”
BJ
Bryan Jones
Trustee, Place 5 (Place 5)
YES
CP
Candy Parsons
Trustee, Place 6 (Place 6)
YES
CV
Chelsa Vinklarek
Trustee, Place 7 (Place 7)
YES
CH
Chris Hinnant
Trustee, Place 1 (Place 1)
YES
GG
Grant Gutierrez
Trustee, Place 2 (Place 2)
YES
JM
Josh Magden
Trustee, Place 3 (Place 3)
YES
MH
Michael Hancock
Trustee, Place 4 (Place 4)
YES

Staff Report & Agenda Item Details

H.8. Consider Approval of an Interlocal Agreement with the City of Smithville Regarding Reciprocal Facility Usage Description: The Proposed Interlocal Agreement (ILA) would allow reciprocal use of facilities for non-profit or governmental purposes, subject to capacity, schedule, and available resources for use. These facilities include the SISD basketball gyms, Smithville Recreation Center and City park spaces. Attachments: ( 1 ) ILA with City of Smithville 4/14/2026 at 9:54 PM

Bastiat Liberty & Property Rights Analysis

This motion is scored as RESTRAINS_GOVERNMENT (Impact Weight: 4.4/10). Under the Bastiat Liberty Watchdog Index, voting YES on measures that cap or reduce ad valorem tax burdens, expand taxpayer exemptions, retire debt early, enforce competitive bidding caps, or remove regulatory/zoning barriers to private property rights earns a positive Pro-Liberty score.