YDHLGE Logo
YDHLGEYou Don't Hate Local Government Enough
Back to Docket Search
13.D • NOTICE is hereby given in accordance with Chapter Hidalgo County (Hidalgo County)

AI-104334: Discussion, consideration, and possible action approving of the First Amendment to the Memorandum of Understanding (“MOU”) between Hidalgo County, through the Hidalgo County Urban County Program (“UCP”), the City of  Progreso (“City”), and Hidalgo County Drainage District No. 1(“HCDD#1”) for the City of Progreso Drainage Outfall Project – Phase I (

Presented in: Hidalgo County Commissioners Court - August 18, 2026 on 2026-08-18
Meeting Agenda PDF

Official Roll-Call Vote

Expands Gov't • 2.2/10 Impact Weight
PASSED (5 - 0)
“AI-104334: Discussion, consideration, and possible action approving of the First Amendment to the Memorandum of Understanding (“MOU”) between Hidalgo County, through the Hidalgo County Urban County Program (“UCP”), the City of  Progreso (“City”), and Hidalgo County Drainage District No. 1(“HCDD#1”) for the City of Progreso Drainage Outfall Project – Phase I (”

Staff Report & Agenda Item Details

AI-104334 Discussion, consideration, and possible action approving of the First Amendment to the Memorandum of Understanding (“MOU”) between Hidalgo County, through the Hidalgo County Urban County Program (“UCP”), the City of  Progreso (“City”), and Hidalgo County Drainage District No. 1(“HCDD#1”) for the City of Progreso Drainage Outfall Project – Phase I (GLO Contract No. 23-152-011-E183), to clarify responsibilities related to real property acquisition, to modify Texas General Land Office (GLO) procurement responsibilities, and establish construction payment and reimbursement procedures in accordance with GLO requirements. Subject to legal approval

Bastiat Liberty & Property Rights Analysis

This motion is scored as EXPANDS_GOVERNMENT (Impact Weight: 2.2/10). Under the Bastiat Liberty Watchdog Index, measures that increase tax rates or fee schedules, issue new debt or Certificates of Obligation, expand regulatory/zoning restrictions on private land use, or authorize unbudgeted spending expansions reduce an official's Freedom Score when voted YES (and reward dissenting NO votes).