YDHLGE Logo
YDHLGEYou Don't Hate Local Government Enough
Back to Docket Search
7 • Consent AgendaCity of Weatherford (Parker County)

b.Consider approval of a Interlocal Cooperation Agreement between the City of Weatherford, the Board of Directors of Tax Increment Reinvestment Zone No. 1, and the Weatherford Local Government Corporation Number 1.(Ashley Seiler, Economic Development Director)Suggested Action:Staff recommends approval of the Interlocal Cooperation Agreement between the City of Weatherford, the Board of Directors of Tax Increment Reinvestment Zone No. 1, and the Weatherford Local Government Corporation Number 1.

Presented in: City of Weatherford City Council on 2026-01-13
Meeting Agenda PDF

Official Roll-Call Vote

Expands Gov't • 7.5/10 Impact Weight
PASSED (5 - 0)
“Motion to approve b.Consider approval of a Interlocal Cooperation Agreement between the City of Weatherford, the Board of Directors of Tax Increment Reinvestment Zone No. 1, and the Weatherford Local Government Corpora”
PP
Paul Paschall
Mayor (At-Large)
YES
RW
Rod White
Councilmember, Place 1 (Place 1)
YES
ZS
Zack Smith
Councilmember, Place 2 (Place 2)
YES
MT
Matt Ticzkus
Councilmember, Place 3 (Place 3)
YES
LW
Luke Williams
Councilmember, Place 4 (Place 4)
YES

Staff Report & Agenda Item Details

7.b.Consider approval of a Interlocal Cooperation Agreement between the City of Weatherford, the Board of Directors of Tax Increment Reinvestment Zone No. 1, and the Weatherford Local Government Corporation Number 1.(Ashley Seiler, Economic Development Director)Suggested Action:Staff recommends approval of the Interlocal Cooperation Agreement between the City of Weatherford, the Board of Directors of Tax Increment Reinvestment Zone No. 1, and the Weatherford Local Government Corporation Number 1.

Bastiat Liberty & Property Rights Analysis

This motion is scored as EXPANDS_GOVERNMENT (Impact Weight: 7.5/10). Under the Bastiat Liberty Watchdog Index, measures that increase tax rates or fee schedules, issue new debt or Certificates of Obligation, expand regulatory/zoning restrictions on private land use, or authorize unbudgeted spending expansions reduce an official's Freedom Score when voted YES (and reward dissenting NO votes).