YDHLGE Logo
YDHLGEYou Don't Hate Local Government Enough
Back to Docket Search
25 • City Council BusinessCity of Waco (McLennan County)

[2026-034] Consider a resolution approving Change Order No. 8, the final change order, closing out the contract with Big Creek Construction, Ltd., for the Mars Drive and Old Hewitt Road Reconstruction Project for pavement repair, driveways, hot mix asphalt, and traffic control necessary due to field conditions, subgrade issues, and safety standards for an additional $283,741.20 (for a revised total contract amount not to exceed $9,356,832.01), and authorizing the City Manager, or designee, to ex

Presented in: City of Waco: 1/20 Regular City Council Meeting on 2026-01-20
Meeting Agenda PDF

Official Roll-Call Vote

Routine / Procedural • 0.0 Score Impact
PASSED (6 - 0)
“[2026-034] Consider a resolution approving Change Order No. 8, the final change order, closing out the contract with Big Creek Construction, Ltd., for the Mars Drive and Old Hewitt Road Reconstruction Project for pavement repair, driveways, hot mix asphalt, and traffic control necessary due to field conditions, subgrade issues, and safety standards for an additional $283,741.20 (for a revised total contract amount not to exceed $9,356,832.01), and authorizing the City Manager, or designee, to ex”
JH
Jim Holmes
Mayor (At-Large)
YES
AJ
Andrea J. Barefield
Councilmember, District 1 (District 1)
YES
IL
Isabel Lozano
Councilmember, District 2 (District 2)
YES
JC
Jed Cole
Councilmember, District 3 (District 3)
YES
DE
Darius Ewing
Councilmember, District 4 (District 4)
YES
GC
George Chase
Councilmember, District 5 (District 5)
YES

Staff Report & Agenda Item Details

Waco City Council Item 25: Consider a resolution approving Change Order No. 8, the final change order, closing out the contract with Big Creek Construction, Ltd., for the Mars Drive and Old Hewitt Road Reconstruction Project fo

Bastiat Liberty & Property Rights Analysis

This docket item is classified as NEUTRAL (0.0 Score Impact). Routine administrative reports, monthly accounts payable/disbursement registers, minutes approvals, and procedural motions are logged for public transparency but carry zero weight in calculating an official's Roll-Call Freedom Score.