YDHLGE Logo
YDHLGEYou Don't Hate Local Government Enough
Back to Docket Search
6 • REGULARGuadalupe County Groundwater Conservation District (Guadalupe County)

Discussion and possible action to approve Annual Manager’s Report for 2025 -

Presented in: Board of Directors Regular Meeting - February 12, 2026 on 2026-02-12
Meeting Agenda PDF

Official Roll-Call Vote

Expands Gov't • 2.6/10 Impact Weight
PASSED (7 - 0)
“Motion to approve Discussion and possible action to approve Annual Manager’s Report for 2025 -”
JS
Jeff Schuehle
Director, District 1 (District 1)
YES
AR
A Robert Raetzsch
Director, District 2 (District 2)
YES
RC
Rebecca Clark
Director, District 3 (District 3)
YES
JN
Jamie Nielson
Director, District 4 (District 4)
YES
CA
Chris Ayotte
Director, District 5 (District 5)
YES
HS
Hilmar Starcke
Director, District 6 (District 6)
YES
MM
Matt Miranda
Director, District 7 (District 7)
YES

Staff Report & Agenda Item Details

Discussion and possible action to approve Annual Manager’s Report for 2025 - Ms. Cochran stated that in accordance with 31 TAC § 356.52(a)(4), the general manager prepares an annual report to the Board of Directors on the performance of the District with respect to achieving the District’s management goals and objectives. Ms. Cochran summarized the 2025 report stating that GCGCD met all of the goals and objectives set forth for 2025. Additionally, Ms. Cochran included a report summarizing the activities of the District, intended to serve as a record for future reference of each year’s projects, achievements, activities. Motion to approve the 2025 Annual Manager’s Report by Rebecca Clark. Second by Jeff Schuehle. Motion approved. Page 2 of 5 GCGCD Minutes February 12, 2026

Bastiat Liberty & Property Rights Analysis

This motion is scored as EXPANDS_GOVERNMENT (Impact Weight: 2.6/10). Under the Bastiat Liberty Watchdog Index, measures that increase tax rates or fee schedules, issue new debt or Certificates of Obligation, expand regulatory/zoning restrictions on private land use, or authorize unbudgeted spending expansions reduce an official's Freedom Score when voted YES (and reward dissenting NO votes).