YDHLGE Logo
YDHLGEYou Don't Hate Local Government Enough
Back to Docket Search
2.B • The following items are of a routine or administraHidalgo County (Hidalgo County)

AI-104595: 1. Discussion, consideration and approval to process the City of Peñitas TIRZ #1 2023-2024 TIRZ payment, in the amount of $131,602.89 pursuant to the interlocal agreement between the City of Peñitas, Hidalgo County, and the Reinvestment Zone No. 1, City of Peñitas. 2. Discussion, consideration and approval to process the City of Peñitas TIRZ #1 202

Presented in: Hidalgo County Commissioners Court - September 15, 2026 on 2026-09-15
Meeting Agenda PDF

Official Roll-Call Vote

Expands Gov't • 7.5/10 Impact Weight
PASSED (5 - 0)
“AI-104595: 1. Discussion, consideration and approval to process the City of Peñitas TIRZ #1 2023-2024 TIRZ payment, in the amount of $131,602.89 pursuant to the interlocal agreement between the City of Peñitas, Hidalgo County, and the Reinvestment Zone No. 1, City of Peñitas. 2. Discussion, consideration and approval to process the City of Peñitas TIRZ #1 202”

Staff Report & Agenda Item Details

AI-104595 1. Discussion, consideration and approval to process the City of Peñitas TIRZ #1 2023-2024 TIRZ payment, in the amount of $131,602.89 pursuant to the interlocal agreement between the City of Peñitas, Hidalgo County, and the Reinvestment Zone No. 1, City of Peñitas. 2. Discussion, consideration and approval to process the City of Peñitas TIRZ #1 2024-2025 TIRZ payment, in the amount of $157,460.88 pursuant to the interlocal agreement between the City of Peñitas, Hidalgo County, and the Reinvestment Zone No. 1, City of Peñitas.

Bastiat Liberty & Property Rights Analysis

This motion is scored as EXPANDS_GOVERNMENT (Impact Weight: 7.5/10). Under the Bastiat Liberty Watchdog Index, measures that increase tax rates or fee schedules, issue new debt or Certificates of Obligation, expand regulatory/zoning restrictions on private land use, or authorize unbudgeted spending expansions reduce an official's Freedom Score when voted YES (and reward dissenting NO votes).