YDHLGE Logo
YDHLGEYou Don't Hate Local Government Enough
Back to Docket Search
2 • ACTIONHarris County Water Control and Improvement District #91 (Harris County)

2026 Waterline Rehabilitation Project The board approved CobbFendley to begin survey and design at the October board meeting. Survey is ongoing. CobbFendley submitted an amendment for the Engineering Feasibility Report to Texas Water Development Board on November 11, 2025 to use trenchless construction for the follow-on phases. TWDB submitted a letter Dec 18, 2025 approving the Engineering Feasibility Report Addendum. Rick Ballew made a motion to accept the report. Michael Gonzalez made the second. The motion passed unanimously. A proposal was discussed to replace the current five foot chain link fence with ninety feet of wrought Iron fencing and 110 feet of chain link fencing at the Rolling Creek facility. Both are eight feet in height. Michael Gonzalez made a motion to approve the replacement. Rick Ballew made the second. The motion passed unanimously. Michael made a motion to proceed with the order for elections of board directors. Rick Ballew made the second. The motion passed unanimously. The meeting was adjourned at 7:20PM. The next meeting will be Tuesday, Feb 10th, at 6:30 PM. Submitted by Richard Ballew Secretary, HCWCID 91

Presented in: Harris County WCID #91 Regular Board Meeting on 2026-01-13
Meeting Agenda PDF

Official Roll-Call Vote

Routine / Procedural • 0.0 Score Impact
PASSED (5 - 0)
“Motion to approve 2026 Waterline Rehabilitation Project The board approved CobbFendley to begin survey and design at the October board meeting. Survey is ongoing. Cobb”
FW
Fred Windisch
Director (Place 1)
YES
SG
Scott Gibson
Director (Place 2)
YES
MG
Michael Gonzalez
Director (Place 3)
YES
RB
Richard Ballew
Director (Place 4)
YES
MH
Marlyn Hovind
Director (Place 5)
YES

Staff Report & Agenda Item Details

Docket item for Harris County WCID #91

Bastiat Liberty & Property Rights Analysis

This docket item is classified as NEUTRAL (0.0 Score Impact). Routine administrative reports, monthly accounts payable/disbursement registers, minutes approvals, and procedural motions are logged for public transparency but carry zero weight in calculating an official's Roll-Call Freedom Score.