Back to Public Records SearchAGUA Special Utility District Full Budget Trend →ELECTED / WONDistrict Waterworks and Sewer System Revenue Bonds, Series 2025; approved additional2023 Wastewater Impact Fee Study, and an Order adopting the imposition of WastewaterThe Advisory Committee reviewed and adopted the October 27, 2023, Agua Impact FeeGov’t Code §395.058 as required to review, evaluate, and update Impact Fees charged byVillarreal, and nominated and appointed Mario Flores to the Agua SUD Impact Fee Advisoryto consider amendments to land use assumptions, capital improvement plan and impact feessubmitted to Matermi, LLC, for the cost related to water service for Maluz III Subdivision.submitted to Mr. Oscar Santos, for the cost related to water service for Carrizales Subdivisionsubmitted to Mr. Uner Gomez, for the cost related to water service for Renu Acres Subdivision.temporary sewer services for Bella Vista Subdivision Lots 1 & 2. The motion was made bysubmitted to F&T, LLC, for the cost related to water service for lowa Groves Subdivision. TheApproval of a Non-Standard Service Agreement for water to be submitted to Cruz Rios andDiscussion and possible action authorizing General Manager to solicit competitive bids for theDiscussion and possible action on a Non-Standard Service Agreement for water to beUS, LLC, for Agua SUD’s water treatment chemicals as the sole responsible bidder. TheApproval of a Non-Standard Service Agreement for water and wastewater to be submitted toDiscussion and possible action on a Non-Standard Service Agreement for water to beDiscussion and possible action on approval of the agreement for the Authorized Agent forDiscussion and possible action on approval of a professional services agreement for GrantDiscussion and possible action on a Non-Standard Service Agreement for water to beAuthorize General Manager to resolicit competitive bids for the Main Lift Station Dischargeagreement with Performance Services, Inc. The motion was made by Mr. Roel De Hoyos andDiscussion and possible action on a Non-Standard Service Agreement for water to be$257,819.39 as the lowest bidder for materials for the water line extension on Mile 3 Road,Discussion and possible action on approval of a contract extension for an additional year withDiscussion and possible action on amendment of a Non-Standard Service Agreement for waterResolution Enforcing Competitive Sealed Bidding Caps & Rejecting Over-Budget Vendor Change OrdersDiscussion and possible action on approval of a contract with the most highly qualifiedreducing the time of contract to six months and reducing the contract amount to $5,000 subjectApproval of a Non-Standard Service Agreement for water to be submitted to EIA PropertiesDiscussion and possible action on approval to enter into an agreement with Copy Graphics,Resolution Enforcing Competitive Sealed Bidding Caps & Rejecting Over-Budget Vendor Change OrdersApproval of a Non-Standard Service Agreement for water and wastewater to be submitted toApproval of a Non-Standard Service Agreement for water to be submitted to Juan Jose GarciaDiscussion and possible action on a Non-Standard Service Agreement for water to besewer CCN transfer agreements with City of La Joya. The motion was made by Mrs. AnaApproval of a Non-Standard Service Agreement for water to be submitted to VJD Properties,Discussion and possible action on approval of contract extension for an additional year withagreement with Hidalgo County Irrigation District No. 16, pursuant to Subchapter O, Ch. 49,Resolution Releasing Unused Public Utility Easements & Returning Right-of-Way to Private LandownersDiscussion and possible action on an Amended Non-Standard Service Agreement for water toFinancial Report and audit as presented by Ms. Esmeralda Yniguez, Carr, Riggs & Ingram,Order Approving Fixed-Price Infrastructure Maintenance Contract Below Budget EstimateOrder Approving Fixed-Price Infrastructure Maintenance Contract Below Budget EstimateApproval of a Non-Standard Service Agreement for water to be submitted to Illiana Garcia forApproval of amended Non-Standard Service Agreement for water to be submitted to R&HDiscussion and possible action authorizing General Manager to solicit competitive bids for theDelivery Contract between Agua SUD and Hidalgo County Irrigation No. 6. The motion wasDiscussion and possible action on approval of contract extension for an additional year withOrder Approving Fixed-Price Infrastructure Maintenance Contract Below Budget EstimateDiscussion and possible action on approval of Encroachment Agreement between Agua SUDDiscussion and possible action on an Amended Non-Standard Service Agreement for water tocontract with the Insurance Agent of Record for the District, in accordance with TexasAuthorize General Manager to solicit competitive bids for the Main Lift Station DischargeDiscussion and possible action on the approval of the Interlocal Agreement between the CityDiscussion and possible action on a Non-Standard Service Agreement for water to beDiscussion and possible action on a Non-Standard Service Agreement for water to beDiscussion and possible action on an Amended Non-Standard Service Agreement for water toDiscussion and possible action on the award of quote/bid to the lowest responsible bidder forDiscussion and possible action on award of bid to lowest responsible bidder for the Tom Gilland signers to Agua SUD’s various financial and escrow accounts. The motion was made byThe motion was made by Mrs. Esmeralda H. Solis and seconded by Mr. Lloyd Loya and was13.Directors (President, Vice President, Secretary, and Treasurer). The motion was made by Mrs.Water Rights, Rates and Planning. The motion was made by Mr. Ivan Sandoval and secondedStage 3 and Stage 4 of the drought contingency plan. The motion was made by Mr. RicardoDiscussion and possible action on the selection of a Medical Insurance Agent of Record forDiscussion and possible action on approval of resolution authorizing the issuance of Agua2 Settlement Program by Ricardo Perez, Perez Law Firm. The Board of Directors approved aDiscussion and possible action on the approval of amended Water and Sewer CCN TransferGeneral Manager’s Report:for the Havana Water Treatment Plant Filter No. 1-5 Rehabilitation. The motion was made byDiscussion and possible action on approval of vendor(s) for oil changes and preventive15.submitted to Antioco G. Cantu Garza, for the cost related to water service for G.E.O.Resolution Adopting Open-Checkbook Financial Transparency & Independent Audit Controlssubmitted to Las Dianas Land Development, LLC, for the cost related to water service forNewkirk, as well as Mr. Greg Klement from The Klement Agency, regarding the proposed14.The motion was made by Mr. Lloyd Loya and seconded by Mr. Ivan Sandoval and wasincluding:Discussion and possible action on approval of Service Authorization No. 2 under the MasterDiscussion and possible action authorizing General Manager to solicit requests forsubmitted to City of Palmview, for the cost related to water service for the Goodwin No. 1 Lt22.13.11.wastewater to be submitted to Las Dianas Land Development, LLC, for the cost related toof the Agua SUD by-laws. The motion was made by Mrs. Ana Maria Perez and seconded by6, 2025, to January 13, 2025. The motion was made by Mr. Jose Luis Ochoa, Jr., and secondedOrder Implementing Administrative Hiring Freeze & Consolidating Duplicative Contracts13.General Manager’s Report:on Agua SUD Water Rights, Rates and Planning. Mr. Snowden noted that the District adoptedDiscussion and possible action on the selection of a Property, Casualty and Workers'Discussion and possible action on approval of vendor(s) for oil changes and preventiveDiscussion and possible action on the award of Sodium Chlorite Solution for Agua SUD Wateron proposed amendments to the Agua SUD Land Use Assumptions, Capital ImprovementsDiscussion and possible action on appointment of Advisory Committee pursuant to Tex. LocalResolution Enforcing Statutory Purchasing Limits & Interlocal Cost-Sharing SavingsDiscussion and possible action on the award of Sodium Chlorite Solution for Agua SUD WaterDiscussion and possible action to enable board president and/or general manager to execute aYardline Connection Project Phase II. The motion was made by Mrs. Ana Marfa Perez and16.wastewater to be submitted to Leo Development LLC, for the cost related to water andsubmitted to Erika G. de la Torre, for the cost related to water service for Hacienda La LejuaEnergy Consultant Services for the District. The motion was made by Mr. Gerardo Perez andEngineering Firm for Veterans Blvd relocation of waterline and sanitary sewer lines related to5.08 of the Agua SUD by-laws. The motion was made by Mr. Homero Tijerina and secondedmaterials for water line to city library. The motion was made by Mr. Lloyd Loya and secondeda proposed Order amending Land Use Assumptions, Capital Improvements Plan, andor their designated representatives to apply for HB 500, TWDB Water Supply andthrough Sourcewell Cooperative Purchasing Program. The motion was made by Mr. Gerardosubmitted to Five L Development LTD, for the cost related to water service for LasWater Treatment Plant Filter No. 1-5 Rehabilitation. The motion was made by Mr. Roel DeDiscussion and possible action authorizing General Manager to resolicit Request forDiscussion and possible action on selection of Energy Consultant Services.submitted to Stella Energy Solutions, LLC, for the cost related to water service forResolution Adopting Open-Checkbook Financial Transparency & Independent Audit ControlsProcedures, increasing the per diem rate for Board Directors from $60 to $120 as recommendedDiscussion and possible action regarding offer to purchase easement from City of Mission forDiscussion and possible action on adoption of a resolution to amend the Agua SUD EmployeeBoard President Ochoa asked to remove item 15 from the list and to table the item at this time.Discussion and possible action approving comments on the review and evaluation of the LandWater Treatment Plant Filter No. 1 Rehabilitation. The motion was made by Mrs. Ana MaríaPena Law Firm, PLLC. The motion was made by Mr. Ricardo Perez and seconded by Dr.20.Manager to retain J Pena Law, PLLC for professional legal services related to existing20.Discussion and possible action on award of materials for the water line extension on GilesDiscussion and possible action on award of Abram Water Treatment Plant Filter No. 1District Engineer’s Report:Discussion and possible action on Resolution authorizing Board President, General Manager,17. Discussion and possible action on declaration of surplus items to be disposed as describedsubmitted to R&H Brothers Investment, LP, for the cost related to water service for El Ranchosubmitted to CL3 Properties, LLC, for the cost related to water services for Buena Suerte No.Discussion and possible action on approval of Proposal for the development of a Water andDiscussion and possible action on selecting pre-approved, most highly qualified providers forsubmitted to 3F Developers, LLC, for the cost related to water service for Salida Del SolDistricts 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7 by Directors that represent the areas within their District of noDiscussion and possible action to approve vendors for auto mechanic services for DistrictDiscussion and possible action on the change of date for the September Board Meeting.open session.federal statutes and regulations.most highly qualified provider for District Engineer Services. The motion was made by Mr.Mr. Pierre Newkirk of Newkirk and Newkirk. 1.The Board of Directors received asubmitted to Evert Enterprises, Inc., for the cost related to water service for Los Naranjos Estatesubmitted to Joel and Mercedes Gonzalez, for the cost related to water service for G&Gto consider amendments to the Capital Improvements Plan, and imposition of amended Water2 Settlement Program by Ricardo Perez, Perez Law Firm. The Board of Directors approved aDiscussion and possible action on approval of a temporary surcharge price adjustment forsubmitted to Evert Enterprises Inc, for the cost related to water service for La Reservaof the Agua SUD bylaws. The motion was made by Mr. Gerardo Perez and seconded by Mr.Discussion and possible action on approval of Proposal to provide Professional ServicesSeptember 1, 2025, to September 8, 2025. The motion was made by Mrs. Ana Maria Perez andAntenna for the Sullivan Wastewater Plant through Municipal Pump & Control (MPC) as thePena Chapa Development Inc., Real Solutions, LP, and 3F Ranch LLC. The motion was madewastewater to be submitted to VC&PC Investments, LLC, for the cost related to water andrequest for an Order from the Agua SUD Board of Directors to amend Article 3 of the District’sImprovement Budget. The motion was made by Mr. Roel De Hoyos and seconded by Mr.General Manager. The motion was made by Mr. Ricardo Perez and seconded by Dr. Adriananew General Manager. The motion was made by Mr. Ricardo Perez and seconded by Dr.District Engineer’s Report:Discussion and possible action on approval of variance request from Stage 3 of the DroughtDiscussion and possible action on award of materials for the water line extension on LibertyDiscussion and possible action authorizing the General Manager to select an engineering firmOrder Expanding Departmental Regulatory Compliance Mandates & Interlocal Fee AssessmentsAuthorize General Manager to solicit Request for Proposals (RFP) for Property, Casualty andAuthorize General Manager to solicit Requests for Qualifications (RFQ) for Project Managerdistrict engineer services. The motion was made by Mr. Roel De Hoyos and seconded by Dr.submitted to 1960 Investment Company, LLC, for the cost related to water service for lowacompleted. The engineering design progress has been completed at 100% for all utilityDiscussion and possible action on selecting pre-approved, most highly qualified providers forDiscussion and possible action on selecting pre-approved, most highly qualified providers forDiscussion and possible action on approval of resolution authorizing the issuance of AguaGeneral Manager to submit an Alternative Capacity Requirement (ACR) application to the17.submitted to Iglesia Bautista Fundamental Berea, a Texas Nonprofit Corporation, for the costResolution Adopting Open-Checkbook Financial Transparency & Independent Audit Controls14.Texas Water Development Board (TWDB), presented by Mr. Robert Salinas, General Managerout documents with CSJ Group for Agua SUD’s Western Road Booster Station & WaterlinePalmview Yard Line Project (Hook-Up Project). The motion was made by Mr. Ivan SandovalDistrict including public relations and website services. Questions were asked by Directors’Discussion and possible action on award of Main Lift Station Discharge Pipe at SullivanDiscussion and possible action on approval and execution of a License Permit for ElectricDiscussion and possible action to approve vendors for tire maintenance and repairs for Districtdeclaring unopposed candidates for the offices of District 4, District 5, District 6, and Districtlakes. The current combined water levels for Amistad and Falcon Lake are averagingDiscussion and possible action authorizing General Manager to negotiate and execute adepository services. The motion was made by Mrs. Ana Maria Perez and seconded by Mr.submitted to Mr. Gerardo William Valdez, for the cost related to water service for Originresponsible bidder in the amount of $89,750.00 for the Sullivan Lift Station S3 Pipelinewith Robinson Insurance Agency and Newkirk and Newkirk as agent of record formotion was made by Mrs. Ana Maria Perez and seconded by Mr. Ricardo Perez, andmotor for the Vactor Truck by the pre-approved Diesel Mechanic. The motion was made byLiberty Road Widening Water Line Relocation Project as recommended by Mr. Roberto2023 Water and Wastewater Land Use Assumptions, Capital Improvements Plan, Impact Feebe submitted to Vaquero OR Mission Partners, LP, for the cost related to water service for19.
RD
SPECIAL_DISTRICT • Hidalgo COUNTY
Roel De Hoyos
Director, Place 1 (Place 1)
Elected Director, Place 1 for AGUA Special Utility District.
finance@aguasud.com956-585-2459
Multi-Year Roll-Call & Fiscal Trajectory (2000–2026)
Voting Liberty Trend & Jurisdiction Budget Growth
5-Yr Roll-Call Trend
▲ +4.9 pts
Career Shift: +4.9 pts
Pro-Liberty Roll-Calls
231 Votes
vs. 56 Expansion Votes
Jurisdiction Budget (YoY)
+2.8% YoY
27-Yr CAGR: +3.3%/yr
5-Yr Jurisdiction Budget
+16.5% (5Y)
10Y: +36.4% • Since '00: +140.5%
Annual Roll-Call Liberty Trajectory (2021–2026)5 Recorded Legislative Sessions
2021: 70.8 (B)2021: 70.8 (B)2026: 75.7 (B)
Electoral History & Canvass Margins
May 2025 AGUA Special Utility District Official General Election Canvass (2025-05-03)
Director, Place 1 (Place 1)
Roel De Hoyos (Current Profile)100.0% (141 votes)
Early Voting: 86Election Day: 48Mail Ballots: 7
Roll-Call Voting Record & Scorecard
Total Recorded Votes
465
Yes Votes
436 (94%)
No / Dissenting Votes
11 (2%)
Abstentions
0
Recorded Public Votes Log
Ordered from most impactful to Freedom Score to least impactful#1VOTED: YES+9.0 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2025-09-15#2VOTED: YES-7.5 Score Impact • Gov't ExpansionOutcome: PASSED (4-0)
2024-04-08#3VOTED: YES-7.5 Score Impact • Gov't ExpansionOutcome: PASSED (8-0)
2023-12-08#4VOTED: NO+7.4 Score Impact • Pro-Liberty Dissent (Opposed Overreach)Outcome: TABLED (0-7)
2026-01-19#5VOTED: YES-7.3 Score Impact • Gov't ExpansionOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2026-02-09#6VOTED: YES-7.3 Score Impact • Gov't ExpansionOutcome: PASSED (8-0)
2021-09-02#7VOTED: YES+7.2 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2025-05-05#8VOTED: YES+7.2 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2025-05-05#9VOTED: YES+7.1 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2026-02-09#10VOTED: YES+6.7 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (8-0)
2025-06-02#11VOTED: YES+6.6 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2026-02-09#12VOTED: YES+5.1 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (8-0)
2026-10-05#13VOTED: YES+5.1 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (8-0)
2026-02-02#14VOTED: YES+5.1 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (8-0)
2026-02-02#15VOTED: YES+5.1 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2025-05-05#16VOTED: YES-5.0 Score Impact • Gov't ExpansionOutcome: PASSED (8-0)
2026-08-03#17VOTED: YES-5.0 Score Impact • Gov't ExpansionOutcome: PASSED (8-0)
2025-09-08#18VOTED: YES-4.9 Score Impact • Gov't ExpansionOutcome: PASSED (8-0)
2026-08-03#19VOTED: YES+4.9 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (8-0)
2026-05-04#20VOTED: YES+4.9 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (8-0)
2026-05-04#21VOTED: YES+4.8 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (8-0)
2026-10-05#22VOTED: YES+4.8 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2026-06-01#23VOTED: YES+4.8 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (8-0)
2025-09-08#24VOTED: YES+4.8 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2025-05-05#25VOTED: YES+4.7 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (8-0)
2026-10-05#26VOTED: YES-4.7 Score Impact • Gov't ExpansionOutcome: PASSED (8-0)
2026-05-04#27VOTED: YES+4.7 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (8-0)
2025-01-27#28VOTED: YES-4.7 Score Impact • Gov't ExpansionOutcome: PASSED (8-0)
2024-01-16#29VOTED: YES-4.7 Score Impact • Gov't ExpansionOutcome: PASSED (8-0)
2021-01-14#30VOTED: YES+4.6 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (8-0)
2026-10-05#31VOTED: YES+4.6 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (8-0)
2026-10-05#32VOTED: YES+4.6 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (8-0)
2026-08-06#33VOTED: YES-4.6 Score Impact • Gov't ExpansionOutcome: PASSED (8-0)
2026-08-03#34VOTED: YES-4.6 Score Impact • Gov't ExpansionOutcome: PASSED (8-0)
2026-08-03#35VOTED: YES+4.6 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (8-0)
2026-05-04#36VOTED: YES+4.6 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (6-0)
2025-08-04#37VOTED: YES+4.5 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (8-0)
2026-09-14#38VOTED: YES+4.5 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (8-0)
2026-08-31#39VOTED: YES+4.5 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (3-0)
2026-04-13#40VOTED: YES+4.5 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (8-0)
2025-12-06#41VOTED: YES+4.5 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (8-0)
2025-09-08#42VOTED: YES+4.5 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2025-05-05#43VOTED: YES+4.5 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (8-0)
2025-03-17#44VOTED: YES+4.5 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (8-0)
2024-08-10#45VOTED: YES-4.4 Score Impact • Gov't ExpansionOutcome: PASSED (8-0)
2026-09-14#46VOTED: YES-4.4 Score Impact • Gov't ExpansionOutcome: PASSED (8-0)
2026-09-14#47VOTED: YES+4.4 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (8-0)
2026-02-02#48VOTED: YES+4.4 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (7-0)
2026-01-19#49VOTED: YES+4.4 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (8-0)
2025-09-08#50VOTED: YES+4.4 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (8-0)
2024-12-07#51VOTED: YES+4.3 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (8-0)
2026-08-03#52VOTED: YES+4.3 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (8-0)
2025-09-08#53VOTED: YES+4.3 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (4-0)
2024-07-01#54VOTED: YES-4.2 Score Impact • Gov't ExpansionOutcome: PASSED (8-0)
2026-08-03#55VOTED: YES-4.2 Score Impact • Gov't ExpansionOutcome: PASSED (8-0)
2026-08-03#56VOTED: YES-4.2 Score Impact • Gov't ExpansionOutcome: PASSED (8-0)
2026-02-02#57VOTED: YES+4.2 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (8-0)
2026-02-02#58VOTED: YES+4.2 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (8-0)
2025-09-08#59VOTED: YES+4.2 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (8-0)
2025-09-08#60VOTED: YES+4.2 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (8-0)
2024-01-16#61VOTED: NO-3.7 Score Impact • Opposed ReformOutcome: FAILED (0-5)
2023-12-11#62VOTED: NO+3.7 Score Impact • Pro-Liberty Dissent (Opposed Overreach)Outcome: FAILED (0-8)
2021-08-06#63VOTED: NO-3.7 Score Impact • Opposed ReformOutcome: FAILED (0-8)
2021-07-01#64VOTED: NO-3.5 Score Impact • Opposed ReformOutcome: FAILED (0-5)
2023-12-11#65VOTED: NO-3.3 Score Impact • Opposed ReformOutcome: FAILED (0-8)
2021-04-01#66VOTED: NO-3.0 Score Impact • Opposed ReformOutcome: TABLED (0-4)
2024-04-08#67VOTED: YES+2.9 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (8-0)
2026-09-14#68VOTED: YES-2.9 Score Impact • Gov't ExpansionOutcome: PASSED (8-0)
2026-08-03#69VOTED: YES+2.9 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (6-0)
2026-07-20#70VOTED: YES+2.9 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (8-0)
2026-05-04#71VOTED: YES+2.9 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (8-0)
2026-05-04#72VOTED: YES+2.9 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (3-0)
2026-04-13#73VOTED: YES-2.9 Score Impact • Gov't ExpansionOutcome: PASSED (8-0)
2025-09-08#74VOTED: YES+2.9 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (8-0)
2025-06-02#75VOTED: YES+2.9 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (6-0)
2025-04-07#76VOTED: YES+2.9 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (8-0)
2025-03-17#77VOTED: YES+2.9 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (6-0)
2025-03-10#78VOTED: YES+2.9 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (6-0)
2025-01-13#79VOTED: YES+2.9 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2024-08-05#80VOTED: NO-2.9 Score Impact • Opposed ReformOutcome: FAILED (0-8)
2021-08-06#81VOTED: YES+2.8 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (6-0)
2026-07-20#82VOTED: YES+2.8 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (8-0)
2026-05-04#83VOTED: YES+2.8 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (8-0)
2026-02-02#84VOTED: YES+2.8 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (6-0)
2025-12-15#85VOTED: YES+2.8 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (8-0)
2025-06-02#86VOTED: YES+2.8 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (8-0)
2025-06-02#87VOTED: YES+2.8 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (8-0)
2025-06-02#88VOTED: YES-2.8 Score Impact • Gov't ExpansionOutcome: PASSED (6-0)
2025-03-10#89VOTED: YES-2.8 Score Impact • Gov't ExpansionOutcome: PASSED (6-0)
2024-12-16#90VOTED: YES+2.8 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (6-0)
2024-12-16#91VOTED: YES+2.8 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (8-0)
2024-08-10#92VOTED: YES+2.8 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (4-0)
2024-06-03#93VOTED: YES+2.8 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (8-0)
2024-01-16#94VOTED: YES+2.8 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (8-0)
2021-02-04#95VOTED: YES-2.7 Score Impact • Gov't ExpansionOutcome: PASSED (8-0)
2026-09-14#96VOTED: YES+2.7 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (8-0)
2026-09-14#97VOTED: YES+2.7 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (8-0)
2026-08-31#98VOTED: YES+2.7 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (3-0)
2026-04-13#99VOTED: YES+2.7 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (8-0)
2026-02-02#100VOTED: YES+2.7 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (8-0)
2025-12-06#101VOTED: YES+2.7 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (8-0)
2025-09-08#102VOTED: YES+2.7 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (8-0)
2025-09-08#103VOTED: YES-2.7 Score Impact • Gov't ExpansionOutcome: PASSED (6-0)
2025-08-04#104VOTED: YES-2.7 Score Impact • Gov't ExpansionOutcome: PASSED (6-0)
2025-03-10#105VOTED: YES+2.7 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (4-0)
2025-02-18#106VOTED: YES+2.7 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (6-0)
2025-01-13#107VOTED: YES+2.7 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (6-0)
2024-12-16#108VOTED: YES+2.7 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (4-0)
2024-07-01#109VOTED: YES+2.7 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2023-12-11#110VOTED: YES+2.7 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (8-0)
2021-09-02#111VOTED: YES+2.6 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (3-0)
2026-04-13#112VOTED: YES+2.6 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (3-0)
2026-04-13#113VOTED: YES+2.6 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (3-0)
2026-04-13#114VOTED: YES+2.6 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (3-0)
2026-04-13#115VOTED: YES+2.6 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2026-02-09#116VOTED: YES+2.6 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (8-0)
2025-09-08#117VOTED: YES-2.6 Score Impact • Gov't ExpansionOutcome: PASSED (8-0)
2025-09-08#118VOTED: YES+2.6 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2025-05-05#119VOTED: YES+2.6 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (8-0)
2024-12-07#120VOTED: YES+2.6 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (4-0)
2024-07-01#121VOTED: YES+2.5 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (8-0)
2026-09-14#122VOTED: YES+2.5 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (8-0)
2026-08-03#123VOTED: YES+2.5 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (6-0)
2026-07-20#124VOTED: YES-2.5 Score Impact • Gov't ExpansionOutcome: PASSED (8-0)
2026-06-10#125VOTED: YES+2.5 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (3-0)
2026-04-13#126VOTED: YES-2.5 Score Impact • Gov't ExpansionOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2025-11-20#127VOTED: YES+2.5 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (8-0)
2025-06-02#128VOTED: YES+2.5 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (3-0)
2024-07-15#129VOTED: YES+2.5 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2023-12-11#130VOTED: YES+2.4 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (8-0)
2026-10-05#131VOTED: YES+2.4 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (8-0)
2026-09-14#132VOTED: YES+2.4 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (8-0)
2026-05-04#133VOTED: YES-2.4 Score Impact • Gov't ExpansionOutcome: PASSED (8-0)
2026-03-23#134VOTED: YES+2.4 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (8-0)
2026-02-02#135VOTED: YES+2.4 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (7-0)
2026-01-19#136VOTED: YES+2.4 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2025-09-15#137VOTED: YES+2.4 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (8-0)
2025-09-08#138VOTED: YES+2.4 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (8-0)
2025-09-08#139VOTED: YES+2.4 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2025-05-05#140VOTED: YES-2.4 Score Impact • Gov't ExpansionOutcome: PASSED (8-0)
2021-01-14#141VOTED: YES+2.3 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (8-0)
2026-09-14#142VOTED: YES+2.3 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (8-0)
2026-08-03#143VOTED: YES+2.3 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (6-0)
2026-07-20#144VOTED: YES+2.3 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (6-0)
2026-07-20#145VOTED: YES+2.3 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (3-0)
2026-04-13#146VOTED: YES+2.3 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2025-11-03#147VOTED: YES+2.3 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2025-05-05#148VOTED: YES-2.3 Score Impact • Gov't ExpansionOutcome: PASSED (6-0)
2025-04-07#149VOTED: YES-2.3 Score Impact • Gov't ExpansionOutcome: PASSED (3-0)
2024-01-22#150VOTED: YES+2.2 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (6-0)
2026-07-20#151VOTED: YES+2.2 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (8-0)
2026-05-04#152VOTED: YES-2.2 Score Impact • Gov't ExpansionOutcome: PASSED (3-0)
2026-04-13#153VOTED: YES+2.2 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2026-02-09#154VOTED: YES+2.2 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (8-0)
2025-09-08#155VOTED: YES+2.2 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (6-0)
2025-08-04#156VOTED: YES+2.2 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (6-0)
2025-08-04#157VOTED: YES+2.2 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2025-05-05#158VOTED: YES+2.2 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (6-0)
2025-04-07#159VOTED: YES+2.2 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (6-0)
2024-12-16#160VOTED: YES+2.2 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (6-0)
2024-12-16#161VOTED: YES+2.2 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2024-04-22#162VOTED: YES+2.2 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2024-04-22#163VOTED: YES+2.2 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (8-0)
2024-01-16#164VOTED: YES+2.2 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (8-0)
2024-01-16#165VOTED: YES+2.1 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (8-0)
2026-10-05#166VOTED: YES+2.1 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (8-0)
2026-08-31#167VOTED: YES-2.1 Score Impact • Gov't ExpansionOutcome: PASSED (8-0)
2026-08-06#168VOTED: YES+2.1 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (8-0)
2026-08-03#169VOTED: YES+2.1 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (8-0)
2026-08-03#170VOTED: YES+2.1 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2026-02-09#171VOTED: YES+2.1 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2026-02-09#172VOTED: YES+2.1 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (7-0)
2025-10-06#173VOTED: YES+2.1 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (8-0)
2025-09-08#174VOTED: YES-2.1 Score Impact • Gov't ExpansionOutcome: PASSED (8-0)
2025-09-08#175VOTED: YES-2.1 Score Impact • Gov't ExpansionOutcome: PASSED (8-0)
2025-09-08#176VOTED: YES+2.1 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (6-0)
2025-08-04#177VOTED: YES+2.1 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (8-0)
2025-06-02#178VOTED: YES+2.1 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (4-0)
2025-02-18#179VOTED: YES+2.1 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (8-0)
2025-01-27#180VOTED: YES+2.1 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (6-0)
2024-12-16#181VOTED: YES+2.1 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2024-08-05#182VOTED: YES+2.1 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (3-0)
2024-01-22#183VOTED: YES+2.1 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (8-0)
2021-07-01#184VOTED: YES-2.1 Score Impact • Gov't ExpansionOutcome: PASSED (8-0)
2021-01-14#185VOTED: YES-2.0 Score Impact • Gov't ExpansionOutcome: PASSED (8-0)
2026-09-14#186VOTED: YES+2.0 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (8-0)
2026-09-14#187VOTED: YES+2.0 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (8-0)
2026-09-14#188VOTED: YES+2.0 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (8-0)
2026-08-31#189VOTED: YES+2.0 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (5-0)
2026-06-01#190VOTED: YES-2.0 Score Impact • Gov't ExpansionOutcome: PASSED (8-0)
2026-05-04#191VOTED: YES+2.0 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (7-0)
2026-01-19#192VOTED: YES+2.0 Score Impact • Pro-LibertyOutcome: PASSED (7-0)
2026-01-19#193VOTED: ABSENT0.0 Score Impact • ProceduralOutcome: PASSED (4-0)
2024-10-07#194VOTED: ABSENT0.0 Score Impact • ProceduralOutcome: PASSED (4-0)
2024-10-07#195VOTED: ABSENT0.0 Score Impact • ProceduralOutcome: PASSED (4-0)
2024-10-07#196VOTED: ABSENT0.0 Score Impact • ProceduralOutcome: PASSED (3-0)
2024-05-06#197VOTED: ABSENT0.0 Score Impact • ProceduralOutcome: PASSED (3-0)
2024-05-06#198VOTED: ABSENT0.0 Score Impact • ProceduralOutcome: PASSED (4-0)
2024-03-04#199VOTED: ABSENT0.0 Score Impact • ProceduralOutcome: TABLED (0-4)
2024-03-04#200VOTED: ABSENT0.0 Score Impact • ProceduralOutcome: PASSED (4-0)
2024-03-04